Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kim Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kim Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kim Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kim Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:53 | 05:57 to 04:04 | 32.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:22 | 06:22 to 05:00 | 23.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:49 | 02:34 to 01:45 | 13.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 04:42 to 03:54 | 13.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:46 | 04:56 to 04:10 | 13.1% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:40 to 04:29 | 3.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 04:04 to 04:01 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:18 to 36:18 | 0.0% |
| Kim Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 03:24 | 04:18 +00:38 | 04:14 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:08 | 08:20 | 04:33 -00:25 | 08:32 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 12:28 | 02:37 -00:31 | 13:05 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 14:34 | 04:54 -00:18 | 15:42 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 19:10 | 04:21 +00:21 | 20:36 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 04:29 | 23:52 | 04:53 -00:24 | 24:57 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:04 | 28:21 | 04:32 -00:28 | 29:50 -01:29 |
| Running 5 | 04:40 | 32:25 | 05:00 -00:20 | 34:22 -01:57 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 37:05 | 04:36 +00:04 | 39:22 -02:17 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 41:45 | 04:54 -00:06 | 43:58 -02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 46:33 | 01:58 +00:36 | 48:52 -02:19 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 49:07 | 04:52 -00:04 | 50:50 -01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 53:55 | 04:27 +01:30 | 55:42 -01:47 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 59:52 | 05:17 +00:11 | 01:00:09 -00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:05:20 | 05:38 +00:44 | 01:05:26 -00:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:13 | 01:16:47 | 05:43 -00:30 | 01:16:47 |
Steven Kim delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 214 out of 1059 athletes, placing him in the top 20%. Within his age group, he ranked 33rd, marking him in the top 17% of his peers. His total running time of 36:18 was notably 2:40 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, Steven started the race with a particularly fast pace, evident in his Running 1 segment where he was 48 seconds faster than average. This might have contributed to a gradual slowdown in subsequent running segments, suggesting that his pacing might have been too aggressive initially. Overall, Steven's performance indicates a strong runner profile with room for improvement in strength-based events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cunningham Jake | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:18 | |
| Pach Alexander | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:17:14 | |
| Joliet Nicolas | 2024 Köln | 01:16:54 | |
| Fuertes Gago Adrian | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:07 | |
| Flaherty Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:16:51 | |
| Grzelak Bartłomiej | 2024 Gdansk | 01:16:43 | |
| Kelter Klaus | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:16:24 | |
| Collins Jack | 2023 London | 01:16:43 | |
| Moreno Doval Jaime | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:38 | |
| Lanzara Alesio | 2023 Dallas | 01:17:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
