Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 975 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kane Megan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kane Megan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kane Megan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kane Megan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:17 | 51:28 to 48:11 | 53.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:55 | 07:08 to 05:13 | 31.3% |
| Rowing | 00:56 | 06:25 to 05:29 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:31 to 06:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Kane Megan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:28 | 00:00 | 05:26 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 05:28 | 05:14 -00:06 | 05:26 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 06:20 | 10:36 | 05:48 +00:32 | 10:40 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 16:56 | 02:57 -00:26 | 16:28 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 06:35 | 19:27 | 06:07 +00:28 | 19:25 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 26:02 | 06:16 -00:57 | 25:32 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 07:07 | 31:21 | 06:10 +00:57 | 31:48 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:31 | 38:28 | 06:53 -00:22 | 37:58 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 07:37 | 44:59 | 06:21 +01:16 | 44:51 +00:08 |
| Rowing | 06:25 | 52:36 | 05:32 +00:53 | 51:12 +01:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 59:01 | 06:14 +00:38 | 56:44 +02:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 01:05:53 | 02:25 -00:25 | 01:02:58 +02:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 01:07:53 | 06:12 +00:32 | 01:05:23 +02:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 01:14:37 | 05:17 -00:45 | 01:11:35 +03:02 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 01:19:09 | 06:45 -01:56 | 01:16:52 +02:17 |
| Wall Balls | 07:08 | 01:23:58 | 05:35 +01:33 | 01:23:37 +00:21 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:36:55 | 07:43 -01:46 | 01:36:55 |
Megan Kane put in a solid performance, ranking in the top 20% overall and top 24% within her age group of 25-29. Her overall time was 01:36:55. An analysis of the splits reveals that Megan's strength lies in her ability to perform well in strength-focused exercises. With faster than average times in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Roxzone, it is evident that Megan has a strong strength profile. However, her overall running time was slower than average by 02:11, indicating that she could benefit from more focused running training. Megan's pacing seemed to slow down over the course of the race, especially from Running 4 onwards, suggesting that she might have started too fast.
To improve her future performance, Megan could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowe Jordan | 2023 Dallas | 01:36:41 | |
| Shepherd Hannah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:37:23 | |
| Ferguson Cassandra | 2023 Madrid | 01:37:24 | |
| Rubio Quesada Laia | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:28 | |
| Finnegan Yvonne | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:33 | |
| Bellew Lydia | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:51 | |
| Nador Rita | 2023 Melbourne | 01:36:40 | |
| Sehnert Stephanie | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:37:00 | |
| Marchal Dellia | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:58 | |
| Steck Julie | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
