Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 699 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hulsebosch Fleur's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hulsebosch Fleur's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hulsebosch Fleur's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hulsebosch Fleur's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:19 | 53:51 to 51:32 | 47.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:22 | 08:51 to 07:29 | 28.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 06:56 to 06:04 | 17.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 05:37 to 05:23 | 4.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 03:14 to 03:08 | 2.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Hulsebosch Fleur | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 05:40 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:37 | 04:32 | 05:23 +00:14 | 05:40 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 06:23 | 10:09 | 06:12 +00:11 | 11:03 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 16:32 | 03:06 +00:08 | 17:15 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 06:59 | 19:46 | 06:34 +00:25 | 20:21 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 26:45 | 06:40 -01:15 | 26:55 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:59 | 32:10 | 06:38 +00:21 | 33:35 -01:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:51 | 39:09 | 07:40 +01:11 | 40:13 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 07:52 | 48:00 | 06:53 +00:59 | 47:53 +00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 55:52 | 05:42 -00:19 | 54:46 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:30 | 01:01:15 | 06:46 -00:16 | 01:00:28 +00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:07:45 | 02:33 -00:32 | 01:07:14 +00:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 01:09:46 | 06:43 +00:01 | 01:09:47 -00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:08 | 01:16:30 | 05:51 -01:43 | 01:16:30 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 07:56 | 01:20:38 | 07:29 +00:27 | 01:22:21 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:28:34 | 06:10 +00:46 | 01:29:50 -01:16 |
| Roxzone | 09:23 | 01:44:45 | 08:45 +00:38 | 01:44:45 |
Fleur Hulsebosch delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 25% overall and top 24% within her age group. Her overall time was 01:44:45, demonstrating strong competitiveness. A notable strength was her quick start, with Running 1 significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong initial pace. However, her total running time was 00:11 slower than average, indicating potential in pacing improvement and running efficiency. Fleur seems to have a more balanced profile, excelling in some strength segments like the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges, but showing room for improvement in running and a few strength-based exercises. Her Roxzone time indicates that transitions can be optimized for better overall race efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kinkade Alyssa | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:45:02 | |
| Bino Giorgia | 2024 Milan | 01:44:48 | |
| Streber Ella | 2022 Dallas | 01:44:30 | |
| Mooney Michele | 2021 Dallas | 01:44:54 | |
| Brink Lisa | 2023 Anaheim | 01:45:06 | |
| Appel Charlotte | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:44:57 | |
| Alter Rebecca | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:44:50 | |
| Heinrich Larissa | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:44:40 | |
| O Connor Elaine | 2024 Dublin | 01:45:05 | |
| Jacobs Jayne | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
