Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hind Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hind Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hind Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hind Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:19 | 46:28 to 42:09 | 78.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 06:15 to 05:07 | 20.5% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:50 to 04:46 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Hind Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 05:27 | 04:28 -00:15 | 04:42 +00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 09:40 | 05:01 +00:31 | 09:10 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 15:12 | 02:57 -00:25 | 14:11 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 17:44 | 05:27 +00:29 | 17:08 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:45 | 23:40 | 05:01 -01:16 | 22:35 +01:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 27:25 | 05:27 +00:19 | 27:36 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 33:11 | 05:24 +00:51 | 33:03 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 39:26 | 05:37 +00:29 | 38:27 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 45:32 | 04:51 -00:01 | 44:04 +01:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 50:22 | 05:29 +00:21 | 48:55 +01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 56:12 | 02:13 -00:12 | 54:24 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 58:13 | 05:27 +00:13 | 56:37 +01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 01:03:53 | 05:11 -00:21 | 01:02:04 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:08:43 | 06:06 +00:09 | 01:07:15 +01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:34 | 01:14:58 | 06:37 -01:03 | 01:13:21 +01:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:37 | 01:27:00 | 07:02 -00:25 | 01:27:00 |
Matt Hind, competing in the 40-44 age group at the 2024 Glasgow HYROX, showcased a commendable performance, placing in the top 59% of all athletes and the top 60% within his age group. His overall time was 01:27:00, with a total running time of 00:46:32, which was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Matt demonstrated a stronger proficiency in strength-based segments, evident from his faster-than-average times in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. This suggests that Matt has a more strength-oriented profile rather than a running-focused one. However, his pacing appeared to be conservative in the initial running segments, hinting at a cautious strategy that might have impacted his overall running time negatively.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies and training routines, Matt Hind has the potential to significantly enhance his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Renner Manuel | 2023 Hannover | 01:26:42 | |
| Lander Matthew | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:24 | |
| Glyn Alex | 2024 London | 01:27:05 | |
| Newbury Phill | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:39 | |
| Hag Nuai | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:27:01 | |
| Mulcahy Diarmaid | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:30 | |
| Silvio Matthew | 2021 Dallas | 01:26:39 | |
| Mistry Karan | 2024 Paris | 01:26:37 | |
| Löffler Kevin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:27:13 | |
| Sowa Adrian | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:26:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:27:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
