Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 999 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hargrave Elyse's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hargrave Elyse's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hargrave Elyse's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hargrave Elyse's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:52 | 52:14 to 48:22 | 58.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:25 | 09:04 to 06:39 | 36.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:25 to 05:07 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Hargrave Elyse | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:26 +00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:29 | 05:16 -00:48 | 05:26 +00:03 |
| Running 2 | 06:07 | 09:57 | 05:52 +00:15 | 10:42 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 16:04 | 02:59 -00:45 | 16:34 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 18:18 | 06:13 +00:09 | 19:33 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 24:40 | 06:18 -00:56 | 25:46 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:30 | 30:02 | 06:13 +00:17 | 32:04 -02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:04 | 36:32 | 06:56 +02:08 | 38:17 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:24 | 45:36 | 06:25 -00:01 | 45:13 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 52:00 | 05:34 -00:45 | 51:38 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 56:49 | 06:17 +00:35 | 57:12 -00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:03:41 | 02:26 -00:22 | 01:03:29 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:38 | 01:05:45 | 06:15 +00:23 | 01:05:55 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:12:23 | 05:19 +00:06 | 01:12:10 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 07:56 | 01:17:48 | 06:49 +01:07 | 01:17:29 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 03:52 | 01:25:44 | 05:42 -01:50 | 01:24:18 +01:26 |
| Roxzone | 08:21 | 01:37:48 | 07:48 +00:33 | 01:37:48 |
Elyse Hargrave performed commendably in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, achieving a rank in the top 24% both overall and within her age group. Her overall time was 01:37:48, placing her solidly among the top competitors. Elyse showcased notable strength in the Ski Erg, Rowing, and Sled exercises, where she consistently outperformed the average. However, her total running time was 02:11 slower than average, indicating that she might have a stronger inclination towards strength-based exercises rather than running. The initial running segments suggest she may have started at a controlled pace, slightly slower than average, which could have been strategic or due to pacing challenges. Her roxzone time indicates a potential area for improvement in transitions between exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patel Ishani | 2022 London | 01:38:08 | |
| David Sabrina | 2024 Paris | 01:38:14 | |
| Tejero Esther | 2022 Madrid | 01:38:11 | |
| Beasley Claudia | 2022 London | 01:38:01 | |
| Quinn Robyn | 2024 New York | 01:38:12 | |
| Cabodi Zamira | 2024 Rimini | 01:38:17 | |
| Wagenaar Elizabeth | 2023 München | 01:37:42 | |
| Bica Nadia | 2023 München | 01:37:56 | |
| Fitzpatrick Danni | 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:20 | |
| Nissen Annik | 2018 Hamburg | 01:38:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:46:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
