Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gregson Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gregson Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gregson Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gregson Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:14 | 07:48 to 04:34 | 42.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 03:49 to 02:09 | 21.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:19 | 06:46 to 05:27 | 17.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:50 | 06:43 to 05:53 | 10.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:53 to 04:38 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:48 to 02:36 | 2.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:22 to 05:18 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 05:06 to 05:03 | 0.7% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:09 to 42:09 | 0.0% |
| Gregson Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:06 | 00:00 | 05:10 -02:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 03:06 | 05:08 -00:02 | 05:10 -02:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 08:12 | 05:32 -00:16 | 10:18 -02:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 13:28 | 02:46 +00:02 | 15:50 -02:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 16:16 | 05:50 +00:06 | 18:36 -02:20 |
| Sled Pull | 06:46 | 22:12 | 05:51 +00:55 | 24:26 -02:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 28:58 | 05:52 -00:11 | 30:17 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:43 | 34:39 | 06:14 +00:29 | 36:09 -01:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 41:22 | 06:00 -00:07 | 42:23 -01:01 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 47:15 | 05:25 -00:03 | 48:23 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:23 | 52:37 | 05:54 +00:29 | 53:48 -01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:49 | 59:00 | 02:16 +01:33 | 59:42 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:02:49 | 05:53 -00:01 | 01:01:58 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:08:41 | 04:53 +00:00 | 01:07:51 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 04:07 | 01:13:34 | 06:17 -02:10 | 01:12:44 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 07:48 | 01:17:41 | 05:01 +02:47 | 01:19:01 -01:20 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:31:04 | 07:02 -01:17 | 01:31:04 |
Emma Gregson showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race, ranking in the top 15% of all athletes and in the top 17% of her age group. A highlight was her running performance, with her total running time being 04:38 faster than average, indicating that she has a strong runner's profile. Gregson started the race strong with her Running 1 time being significantly faster than the average. Despite a slower start in some strength-oriented segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, she managed to maintain a good pace throughout the majority of the race, ending strong with a Running 8 time that was considerably faster than average.
Considering Gregson's strong running profile, she should leverage this strength by maintaining a steady and controlled pace during the running segments to conserve energy for the strength-focused segments. Additionally, focusing on transition time and reducing rest periods in the Roxzone can further improve her overall time. Practicing the sequence of events can also help her body adapt to the transitions, making them smoother and faster during the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carraro Manuela | 2023 München | 01:30:34 | |
| Ranzani Arianna | 2024 Turin | 01:31:17 | |
| Curran Deirbhile | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:31:11 | |
| Hutin Suzanna | 2024 Dubai | 01:31:13 | |
| Post Zandria | 2024 Cape Town | 01:31:29 | |
| Sayers Lydia | 2024 London | 01:30:55 | |
| Raben Ines | 2023 Malmö | 01:31:26 | |
| Van Der Beek Nian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:40 | |
| Mouthaan Vivian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:28 | |
| Schneider Leonie | 2023 München | 01:31:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
