Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 720 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:26 (From 55:56 to 51:30) | 70.0% |
| BBJ | 00:50 (From 08:19 to 07:29) | 13.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 (From 05:54 to 05:23) | 8.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 (From 02:51 to 02:31) | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 (From 06:54 to 06:41) | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:34 to 02:34) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:27 to 05:27) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:01 to 05:01) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:19 to 05:19) | 0.0% |
| Geisreiter Eva | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:03 | 00:00 | 05:40 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:54 | 06:03 | 05:22 +00:32 | 05:40 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 06:22 | 11:57 | 06:12 +00:10 | 11:02 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 18:19 | 03:07 -00:33 | 17:14 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 07:34 | 20:53 | 06:33 +01:01 | 20:21 +00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 06:54 | 28:27 | 06:41 +00:13 | 26:54 +01:33 |
| Running 4 | 07:12 | 35:21 | 06:37 +00:35 | 33:35 +01:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:19 | 42:33 | 07:40 +00:39 | 40:12 +02:21 |
| Running 5 | 07:14 | 50:52 | 06:51 +00:23 | 47:52 +03:00 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 58:06 | 05:42 -00:15 | 54:43 +03:23 |
| Running 6 | 07:02 | 01:03:33 | 06:45 +00:17 | 01:00:25 +03:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:10:35 | 02:34 +00:17 | 01:07:10 +03:25 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:13:26 | 06:43 +00:21 | 01:09:44 +03:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 01:20:30 | 05:52 -00:51 | 01:16:27 +04:03 |
| Running 8 | 07:29 | 01:25:31 | 07:28 +00:01 | 01:22:19 +03:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:19 | 01:33:00 | 06:11 -00:52 | 01:29:47 +03:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:44:42 | 08:44 -02:12 | 01:44:42 |
Eva's total running time of 00:55:56 is 3 minutes and 56 seconds slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that her running performance could be improved. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:06:03 is 41 seconds slower than the average, indicating that she may need to focus on increasing her speed and efficiency during the running segments.
To improve performance in these segments, Eva should focus on specific training strategies and techniques:
1. Running 3: Eva's time in this segment was 1 minute and 1 second slower than the average. To improve her running performance, she should focus on interval training, incorporating both speed work and endurance runs. Tempo runs, hill sprints, and interval training sessions will help improve her speed and overall running performance.
2. Burpees Broad Jump: Eva's time in this segment was 58 seconds slower than the average. To improve her performance in this area, she should focus on strength training exercises that target the muscles used during burpees and broad jumps. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts that incorporate burpees and broad jumps will help improve her speed and efficiency in this segment.
3. Best Lap: Eva's best lap time was 41 seconds slower than the average. To improve her speed and efficiency during her best lap, she should incorporate interval training sessions focused on shorter distances. This will help her build speed and endurance, allowing her to perform better during this segment.
4. Running 1, Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, and Running 6: Eva's times in these running segments were slower than the average. To improve her overall running performance, she should incorporate a combination of aerobic and anaerobic exercises into her training routine. Interval training, hill sprints, and long-distance runs will help improve her speed, endurance, and overall running performance.
5. Ski Erg: Eva's time in this segment was 31 seconds slower than the average. To improve her performance on the Ski Erg, she should incorporate specific Ski Erg workouts into her training routine. This could include interval training sessions, focusing on both speed and endurance. Additionally, incorporating strength training exercises that target the muscles used during skiing will aid in improving her performance on the Ski Erg.
In conclusion, Eva Geisreiter performed well in the HYROX race in München, but there are areas where she can make improvements to enhance her performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and efficient transitions, Eva can improve her overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carlsson Carina | 2024 Stockholm | 01:45:05 | |
| Sheffield Megan | 2024 Dallas | 01:44:50 | |
| Crudden Emma | 2023 Birmingham | 01:44:36 | |
| Muhammad Sazali Fawarda | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:45:12 | |
| Müller Bianca | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:44:20 | |
| wiggers cornelie | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:44:25 | |
| Zengerink Floor | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:44:40 | |
| Vasconcelos Lisa | 2023 London | 01:44:14 | |
| Staite Vanessa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:44:42 | |
| Brunckhorst Sarah | 2022 Wien | 01:44:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Geisreiter Eva
