Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Francis Franky's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Francis Franky's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Francis Franky's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Francis Franky's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:02 | 45:56 to 43:54 | 42.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 | 06:22 to 05:15 | 23.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:44 | 05:46 to 05:02 | 15.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 06:02 to 05:32 | 10.5% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:06 to 04:52 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:37 to 04:29 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Francis Franky | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:47 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 03:47 | 04:31 +00:06 | 04:46 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 08:24 | 05:11 +00:16 | 09:17 -00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 13:51 | 03:04 -00:29 | 14:28 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 16:26 | 05:40 -00:10 | 17:32 -01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 21:56 | 05:17 +00:29 | 23:12 -01:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 27:42 | 05:38 -00:09 | 28:29 -00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 33:11 | 05:51 +00:11 | 34:07 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 39:13 | 05:51 -00:04 | 39:58 -00:45 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 45:00 | 04:56 +00:10 | 45:49 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 07:43 | 50:06 | 05:41 +02:02 | 50:45 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 57:49 | 02:18 -00:16 | 56:26 +01:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 59:51 | 05:39 +00:14 | 58:44 +01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:22 | 01:05:44 | 05:31 +00:51 | 01:04:23 +01:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:12:06 | 06:23 +00:00 | 01:09:54 +02:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:18:29 | 07:05 -01:11 | 01:16:17 +02:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:40 | 01:30:56 | 07:34 -00:54 | 01:30:56 |
Franky Francis's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event was commendable, landing him in the top 44% overall and top 31% in his age group. His overall time of 01:30:56 showcases his dedication and capability. However, with a total running time of 45:56, which is 39 seconds slower than average, it suggests that there is room for improvement in running efficiency. Franky's initial segments, particularly Running 1, were impressive, indicating a strong start. However, the significant slowdown in Running 6 suggests possible fatigue or pacing issues. His performance in strength-based exercises like the Wall Balls and Sled Push was strong, pointing to a balanced athlete with a slight edge in strength-based activities but requiring more focus on endurance running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Faber Jan | 2023 Hamburg | 01:30:36 | |
| Feighney James | 2023 Glasgow | 01:30:35 | |
| Weston Daniel | 2021 London | 01:31:20 | |
| Pawliczek Matthias | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:30:40 | |
| Grießler Robert | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:31 | |
| Falk Eike | 2022 Hamburg | 01:30:52 | |
| Franca Matias Damian | 2024 Mexico City | 01:30:34 | |
| Price Cameron | 2023 London | 01:30:41 | |
| Wells Jason | 2024 Taipei | 01:30:44 | |
| Kucharski Daniel | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
