Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fennessy Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fennessy Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fennessy Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fennessy Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:02 | 37:49 to 35:47 | 40.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 04:31 to 03:43 | 15.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 02:44 to 02:07 | 12.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 04:10 to 03:40 | 10.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 04:18 to 03:49 | 9.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 05:02 to 04:42 | 6.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 01:49 to 01:39 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:10 to 04:06 | 1.3% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:25 to 04:24 | 0.3% |
| Fennessy Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:09 | 00:00 | 04:05 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 03:09 | 04:14 -00:04 | 04:05 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 07:19 | 04:23 +00:41 | 08:19 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 12:23 | 02:30 +00:14 | 12:42 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 15:07 | 04:42 +00:24 | 15:12 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 20:13 | 04:08 +00:02 | 19:54 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 24:23 | 04:40 +00:36 | 24:02 +00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:31 | 29:39 | 04:13 +00:18 | 28:42 +00:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 34:10 | 04:49 +00:17 | 32:55 +01:15 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 39:16 | 04:31 -00:06 | 37:44 +01:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 43:41 | 04:42 +00:28 | 42:15 +01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 48:51 | 01:53 -00:04 | 46:57 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 50:40 | 04:42 +00:37 | 48:50 +01:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 55:59 | 04:11 +00:07 | 53:32 +02:27 |
| Running 8 | 03:42 | 01:00:17 | 05:02 -01:20 | 57:43 +02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:03:59 | 05:19 -00:17 | 01:02:45 +01:14 |
| Roxzone | 04:28 | 01:13:22 | 05:18 -00:50 | 01:13:22 |
Paul Fennessy showcased a commendable performance in the Dublin 2024 Hyrox race. Ranking in the top 11% of 2696 athletes and securing 73rd place in his age group (35-39), Paul demonstrated a competitive edge in his category. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in optimising his run time and pacing strategy. Paul's total running time was 37:49, which was 34 seconds slower than the average. This indicates that his running efficiency can be enhanced. Interestingly, his fastest running lap was 3:42, suggesting that he has the potential to maintain a quicker pace. In terms of pacing, Paul started off faster than average in his first run but gradually slowed down over the course of the race. This could be indicative of either overexertion in the initial stages or a lack of stamina to maintain a consistent pace.
Considering Paul's performance, the following strategies could be beneficial:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiederle Julian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:13:47 | |
| Bellicini Giorgio | 2024 Milan | 01:13:33 | |
| Guerin Nicolas | 2024 Marseille | 01:13:45 | |
| Yaxley Joe | 2024 London | 01:13:27 | |
| Pichlmaier Christoph | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:13:45 | |
| Philbin Gerry | 2024 Madrid | 01:13:16 | |
| Flynn Carsten | 2021 Leipzig | 01:13:32 | |
| Cisnal Víctor | 2023 Bilbao | 01:13:12 | |
| Maharaj Ollie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:13:10 | |
| Ferguson Nick | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
