Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cusack Elaine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cusack Elaine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cusack Elaine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cusack Elaine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:34 | 06:50 to 04:16 | 40.1% |
| Run Total | 02:12 | 46:18 to 44:06 | 34.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 06:50 to 05:31 | 20.6% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:32 to 05:13 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Cusack Elaine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:14 | 00:00 | 05:02 -01:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:14 | 05:04 -00:37 | 05:02 -01:48 |
| Running 2 | 07:19 | 07:41 | 05:24 +01:55 | 10:06 -02:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 15:00 | 02:39 -00:16 | 15:30 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 17:23 | 05:39 +00:19 | 18:09 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 23:21 | 05:34 -01:18 | 23:48 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 27:37 | 05:42 +00:31 | 29:22 -01:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:50 | 33:50 | 05:54 +00:56 | 35:04 -01:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 40:40 | 05:50 +00:41 | 40:58 -00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 47:11 | 05:19 +00:13 | 46:48 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 52:43 | 05:44 +00:27 | 52:07 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 58:54 | 02:12 -00:27 | 57:51 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 06:13 | 01:00:39 | 05:42 +00:31 | 01:00:03 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 01:06:52 | 04:38 -00:22 | 01:05:45 +01:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:42 | 01:11:08 | 06:04 -01:22 | 01:10:23 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:50 | 01:15:50 | 04:47 +02:03 | 01:16:27 -00:37 |
| Roxzone | 05:15 | 01:27:48 | 06:34 -01:19 | 01:27:48 |
Elaine Cusack displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race, securing a position in the top 11% of 2696 athletes. She demonstrated strong performances in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where she finished faster than average. Elaine's overall running time was 00:46:18, which was 00:52 slower than the average. This indicates that Elaine is stronger in strength-based segments and could benefit from additional running training. When looking at the pacing throughout the race, it appears Elaine started off strong in the Running 1 segment but had slower than average times in subsequent running segments. This suggests that Elaine may have started the race at a pace that was too fast, leading to slower times in the later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holz Susanne | 2021 Hamburg | 01:28:13 | |
| Coy Caroline | 2019 Miami | 01:28:12 | |
| Rostami Hasti | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:26 | |
| Colo Viviana | 2018 Hamburg | 01:27:52 | |
| Mccann Sally | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:00 | |
| Reed Jamie | 2021 Dallas | 01:28:15 | |
| Hohnroth Laura | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:17 | |
| Ingalls Bailey | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:27:37 | |
| Mrkackova Jana | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:59 | |
| Beumer Mireille | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:27:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
