Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 983 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Crumilsh Annette's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Crumilsh Annette's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Crumilsh Annette's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Crumilsh Annette's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:54 | 07:19 to 05:25 | 41.5% |
| Run Total | 01:44 | 50:42 to 48:58 | 37.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:35 | 05:50 to 05:15 | 12.7% |
| Rowing | 00:21 | 05:53 to 05:32 | 7.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 06:49 to 06:48 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Crumilsh Annette | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 05:29 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:50 | 04:14 | 05:18 +00:32 | 05:29 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:43 | 10:04 | 05:53 +00:50 | 10:47 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 16:47 | 02:58 -00:43 | 16:40 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:49 | 19:02 | 06:14 +00:35 | 19:38 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 25:51 | 06:24 -00:44 | 25:52 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:58 | 31:31 | 06:16 +00:42 | 32:16 -00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 38:29 | 07:09 -00:20 | 38:32 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 07:09 | 45:18 | 06:27 +00:42 | 45:41 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:53 | 52:27 | 05:36 +00:17 | 52:08 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 07:03 | 58:20 | 06:20 +00:43 | 57:44 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:05:23 | 02:26 -00:22 | 01:04:04 +01:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:52 | 01:07:27 | 06:18 +00:34 | 01:06:30 +00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 01:14:19 | 05:24 -00:27 | 01:12:48 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 01:19:16 | 06:59 -02:01 | 01:18:12 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:19 | 01:24:14 | 05:40 +01:39 | 01:25:11 -00:57 |
| Roxzone | 07:22 | 01:38:45 | 07:54 -00:32 | 01:38:45 |
Annette Crumilsh, with an overall rank of 585, placed in the top 21% of 2696 athletes. In her age group of 40-44, she placed 117, ranking in the top 24% of 480 athletes. She displayed a strong performance in the HYROX event, with a total time of 01:38:45. Her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that she might have a hybrid profile. She appeared to start on a faster pace for Running 1, but slowed down in the subsequent running segments. However, she made a significant comeback in Running 8, where she was faster than average, proving her endurance and strong finish.
Considering Annette's performance, it is advisable for her to maintain a steady pace throughout the race rather than starting too fast. This will help her conserve energy for the later stages of the race. Focusing on improving transitions between segments can also help reduce her overall time. Additionally, she should prioritize recovery post-race to ensure she is in optimal condition for her next race. Regular stretching and adequate hydration are key strategies for effective recovery.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franke Lilou | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:38:21 | |
| Philo Kylei | 2024 Anaheim | 01:39:02 | |
| Pescione Ylenia | 2024 Rimini | 01:39:11 | |
| Lipponen Amy | 2024 Brisbane | 01:38:38 | |
| Kreyser Nadine | 2019 Hamburg | 01:38:48 | |
| Riddleston Laura | 2024 Malaga | 01:39:02 | |
| Lee Cherrie | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:38:40 | |
| Richardson Tennille | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:39 | |
| Halloran Danielle | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:08 | |
| Askevold Stina | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:39:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
