Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cosgrove Olivia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cosgrove Olivia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cosgrove Olivia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cosgrove Olivia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:14 | 06:37 to 04:23 | 35.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:37 | 06:53 to 05:16 | 26.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:08 | 06:47 to 05:39 | 18.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:53 to 02:31 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:27 to 02:06 | 5.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 05:19 to 05:00 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:27 to 05:15 | 3.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:00 to 43:00 | 0.0% |
| Cosgrove Olivia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 05:07 -01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 03:43 | 05:05 +00:14 | 05:07 -01:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:48 | 09:02 | 05:25 +00:23 | 10:12 -01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 14:50 | 02:41 +00:12 | 15:37 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 17:43 | 05:43 +00:12 | 18:18 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 06:53 | 23:38 | 05:38 +01:15 | 24:01 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 30:31 | 05:45 +00:03 | 29:39 +00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:47 | 36:19 | 05:58 +00:49 | 35:24 +00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 43:06 | 05:53 +00:03 | 41:22 +01:44 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 49:02 | 05:20 +00:07 | 47:15 +01:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 54:29 | 05:47 -00:01 | 52:35 +01:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 01:00:15 | 02:15 +00:12 | 58:22 +01:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:02:42 | 05:45 +00:05 | 01:00:37 +02:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 01:08:32 | 04:41 -00:55 | 01:06:22 +02:10 |
| Running 8 | 04:18 | 01:12:18 | 06:07 -01:49 | 01:11:03 +01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:16:36 | 04:51 +01:46 | 01:17:10 -00:34 |
| Roxzone | 05:34 | 01:28:40 | 06:39 -01:05 | 01:28:40 |
Olivia Cosgrove, representing Ireland, competed in the 45-49 age group at the 2024 Dublin HYROX event. She finished with an overall rank of 340 out of 2696 athletes, placing her in the top 12%. Within her age group, Olivia ranked 23 out of 267, which is an impressive top 8%.
Olivia's overall time was 01:28:40, with a total running time of 00:43:00. This was 02:51 faster than the average running time, indicating that Olivia has a strong runner's profile. She started the race at a fast pace, with her Running 1 time being 01:21 faster than the average. However, she lost time on various strength-based activities, which indicates a need for more balanced training.
Given Olivia's strong running profile but slower strength segments, she should look to balance her training more effectively. She could consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez Royo Lourdes | 2023 Malaga | 01:29:10 | |
| Neill Claire | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:28:49 | |
| Riley Rachel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:41 | |
| Ward Chloe | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:04 | |
| Groesser Johanna | 2023 München | 01:28:47 | |
| Thoroe SaraLee | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:05 | |
| Luk Ka Wai | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:28:32 | |
| Rocker Anna Lena | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:28:44 | |
| Lenz Sandra | 2024 Hamburg | 01:29:03 | |
| Wischropp Melinda | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
