Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connolly Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connolly Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connolly Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connolly Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:09 | 07:00 to 04:51 | 41.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:40 | 07:52 to 06:12 | 31.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:23 to 02:43 | 12.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:08 to 04:50 | 5.7% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 47:02 to 46:45 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 05:18 to 05:07 | 3.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Connolly Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 05:16 -01:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:18 | 03:37 | 05:11 +00:07 | 05:16 -01:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 08:55 | 05:39 +00:19 | 10:27 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 14:53 | 02:52 +00:31 | 16:06 -01:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 18:16 | 05:59 +00:23 | 18:58 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 24:38 | 06:04 -01:17 | 24:57 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 29:25 | 06:00 +00:43 | 31:01 -01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:52 | 36:08 | 06:36 +01:16 | 37:01 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 44:00 | 06:10 +00:39 | 43:37 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 50:49 | 05:27 -00:07 | 49:47 +01:02 |
| Running 6 | 06:37 | 56:09 | 06:03 +00:34 | 55:14 +00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 01:02:46 | 02:22 -00:09 | 01:01:17 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 01:04:59 | 06:03 +00:26 | 01:03:39 +01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:11:28 | 05:03 +00:05 | 01:09:42 +01:46 |
| Running 8 | 04:29 | 01:16:36 | 06:33 -02:04 | 01:14:45 +01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 07:00 | 01:21:05 | 05:17 +01:43 | 01:21:18 -00:13 |
| Roxzone | 05:51 | 01:33:50 | 07:15 -01:24 | 01:33:50 |
Emma Connolly, representing Ireland, demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX, placing in the top 17% of all athletes and top 20% in her age group (40-44 years). A striking aspect of Emma's performance was her running prowess, with her total running time being 53 seconds faster than average. She started the race on a high note, showcasing a strong start in the first running segment which was 1:35 minutes faster than average. Her exceptional performance continued in the last running segment where she was 2:05 minutes faster than the average, placing her in the elite 1 percentile rank. Emma's overall performance indicates a strong runner profile, although there were certain segments where she lost time, suggesting room for improvement in strength exercises.
Emma could benefit from implementing the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcgowan Niamh | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:47 | |
| Mc Gurk Clare | 2024 Glasgow | 01:33:52 | |
| Bub Nina | 2024 Berlin | 01:33:22 | |
| Walton Bonnie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:51 | |
| Armah Rochelle | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:54 | |
| Brena Jhovana | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:33:40 | |
| BestPrescott Hannah | 2024 Madrid | 01:33:58 | |
| Pam Janet | 2023 Glasgow | 01:34:07 | |
| Williams Vivian | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:24 | |
| Jeschke Diana | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:33:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
