Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Carson Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Carson Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Carson Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Carson Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:35 | 47:02 to 45:27 | 29.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 06:49 to 05:19 | 27.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:18 | 06:51 to 05:33 | 23.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:56 | 04:03 to 03:07 | 17.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 07:13 to 07:05 | 2.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 05:55 to 05:54 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Carson Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 04:56 -01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 03:25 | 04:34 -00:01 | 04:56 -01:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 07:58 | 05:22 +00:22 | 09:30 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 04:03 | 13:42 | 03:11 +00:52 | 14:52 -01:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 17:45 | 05:53 +00:06 | 18:03 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 06:49 | 23:44 | 05:31 +01:18 | 23:56 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 08:43 | 30:33 | 05:52 +02:51 | 29:27 +01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 39:16 | 06:09 -00:14 | 35:19 +03:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 45:11 | 06:04 +00:44 | 41:28 +03:43 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 51:59 | 05:00 -00:15 | 47:32 +04:27 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 56:44 | 05:53 +00:08 | 52:32 +04:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:02:45 | 02:24 -00:26 | 58:25 +04:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 01:04:43 | 05:52 +00:02 | 01:00:49 +03:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:51 | 01:10:37 | 05:45 +01:06 | 01:06:41 +03:56 |
| Running 8 | 04:33 | 01:17:28 | 06:42 -02:09 | 01:12:26 +05:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:13 | 01:22:01 | 07:26 -00:13 | 01:19:08 +02:53 |
| Roxzone | 05:28 | 01:34:33 | 07:59 -02:31 | 01:34:33 |
Mark Carson showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. With a top 49% overall rank among 2696 athletes and a top 56% rank in his age group, Mark demonstrated a balanced mix of endurance and strength. His total running time, however, was 18 seconds slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in his running performance. Interestingly, Mark excelled in the initial and final running segments, but lost significant time in the middle segments, suggesting a potential issue with pacing and stamina. Mark appears to have a hybrid profile, being neither predominantly a runner nor a strength-focused athlete.
Mark should consider adjusting his pacing strategy for the race. Starting too fast might cause him to tire quickly, affecting his performance in later segments. A steady, controlled pace might help him conserve energy for the more challenging segments. Practicing transitions between running and strength segments can also help improve his overall time. Lastly, proper hydration and nutrition during the race will help maintain his energy levels and reduce fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mainwaring Andrew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:58 | |
| Scott Stanley | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:34:32 | |
| Burgoyne Clint | 2023 London | 01:34:49 | |
| Atlanti Anthony | 2024 Milan | 01:34:34 | |
| Allison Charles | 2023 Dallas | 01:34:40 | |
| Rodriguez Santiago | 2024 Brisbane | 01:34:08 | |
| Hannam Joshua | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:44 | |
| Carroll Galen | 2023 Dubai | 01:34:59 | |
| Williams Sersinio | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:23 | |
| Tibballs Damien | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
