Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burton Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burton Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burton Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burton Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:41 | 06:29 to 04:48 | 44.1% |
| Run Total | 01:24 | 42:53 to 41:29 | 36.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:23 to 02:02 | 9.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:54 to 04:36 | 7.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:48 to 04:43 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Burton Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:43 | 04:26 -00:07 | 04:35 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 09:02 | 04:56 +00:22 | 09:01 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:19 | 14:20 | 02:52 -00:33 | 13:57 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 16:39 | 05:23 +00:08 | 16:49 -00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:10 | 04:54 +00:00 | 22:12 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 27:04 | 05:20 +00:05 | 27:06 -00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:23 | 32:29 | 05:17 -00:54 | 32:26 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 36:52 | 05:31 -00:08 | 37:43 -00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 42:15 | 04:49 -00:01 | 43:14 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 47:03 | 05:22 +00:02 | 48:03 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 52:27 | 02:10 +00:13 | 53:25 -00:58 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 54:50 | 05:21 -00:04 | 55:35 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:29 | 01:00:07 | 05:04 +01:25 | 01:00:56 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:06:36 | 05:57 -00:01 | 01:06:00 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:12:32 | 06:29 -01:18 | 01:11:57 +00:35 |
| Roxzone | 07:39 | 01:25:14 | 06:48 +00:51 | 01:25:14 |
Tim Burton delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 530 out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 29%. Within his age group (30-34), he ranked 133rd, situating him in the top 32%. His overall time was 01:25:14, slightly above the average. Notably, Tim's total running time was 00:42:53, which was 00:03 slower than the average, indicating a balanced profile with neither running nor strength significantly dominating.
Tim's pacing reveals that he started moderately with Running 1 being slower than the average but gained momentum and maintained a consistent pace across the subsequent running segments. He demonstrated a strong performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls, showcasing his proficiency in strength-oriented tasks.
By focusing on these strategies and training techniques, Tim can enhance his performance, turning weaker segments into strengths and achieving better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Ben | 2022 Birmingham | 01:24:56 | |
| Eliasson August | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:15 | |
| OConnor Gerard | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:33 | |
| Hignett Flint Louis | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:44 | |
| Steffensen Daniel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:54 | |
| Man Wai | 2018 Essen | 01:24:46 | |
| Mahon James | 2022 London | 01:24:56 | |
| Bernoni Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:53 | |
| Langhorn Bryan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:22 | |
| Currinckx Daniel | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
