Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brown Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brown Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brown Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brown Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:10 | 10:05 to 07:55 | 41.4% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 49:34 to 48:16 | 24.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 07:26 to 06:34 | 16.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 06:40 to 06:06 | 10.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:45 to 02:32 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:48 to 04:41 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Brown Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 05:08 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 03:59 | 04:40 +00:08 | 05:08 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 06:28 | 08:47 | 05:41 +00:47 | 09:48 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 15:15 | 03:29 -00:28 | 15:29 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 18:16 | 06:14 +00:18 | 18:58 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 24:48 | 05:58 -00:36 | 25:12 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:36 | 30:10 | 06:14 +00:22 | 31:10 -01:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:26 | 36:46 | 06:42 +00:44 | 37:24 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 07:28 | 44:12 | 06:28 +01:00 | 44:06 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 51:40 | 05:10 -00:03 | 50:34 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:57 | 56:47 | 06:16 +00:41 | 55:44 +01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 01:03:44 | 02:34 +00:11 | 01:02:00 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:45 | 01:06:29 | 06:16 +00:29 | 01:04:34 +01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:40 | 01:13:14 | 06:15 +00:25 | 01:10:50 +02:24 |
| Running 8 | 04:52 | 01:19:54 | 07:24 -02:32 | 01:17:05 +02:49 |
| Wall Balls | 10:05 | 01:24:46 | 08:11 +01:54 | 01:24:29 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:41:28 | 08:48 -02:04 | 01:41:28 |
Mark Brown performed well in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race, finishing in the top 56% of all athletes and in the top 61% of his age group (30-34). His total running time was 17 seconds faster than the average, suggesting that he has a stronger runner profile. Mark started off the race at a faster pace than the average, as seen in his 'Running 1' segment, which was 1:06 faster than the average. He maintained a consistently faster pace in his 'Roxzone', finishing 2:03 faster than the average. However, his performance in 'Running 2' and 'Running 5' segments indicates that he slowed down during the middle of the race, which could have impacted his overall time.
Based on Mark's performance, it seems that he started the race at a faster pace but then slowed down in the middle. In future races, he might benefit from a more consistent pacing strategy. He should also focus on improving his transitions between segments to save time. Given his strong running profile, Mark might also want to consider incorporating more strength training into his routine to balance out his overall fitness profile and enhance his performance in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Young Lindsay | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:41 | |
| Wong Laurent | 2024 Marseille | 01:41:42 | |
| Denny Will | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:07 | |
| Kiener Daniel | 2023 München | 01:41:17 | |
| Donegana Luca | 2024 Milan | 01:41:21 | |
| Kor Shu Yen | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:41:09 | |
| Marquez Edwin | 2021 Dallas | 01:41:43 | |
| Jiang Chun | 2024 New York | 01:41:17 | |
| Malcolm Andrew | 2024 Manchester | 01:41:53 | |
| Vidi Harsu | 2022 Manchester | 01:41:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:23:44 | |
| 2024 Dubai | 01:48:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
