Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcreynolds Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcreynolds Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcreynolds Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcreynolds Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:17 | 47:36 to 42:19 | 85.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:27 | 05:36 to 05:09 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:37 to 04:25 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 04:52 to 04:45 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:52 to 04:46 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Mcreynolds Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:35 | 04:28 +00:09 | 04:43 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 09:12 | 05:02 +00:15 | 09:11 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 14:29 | 02:57 -00:35 | 14:13 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 16:51 | 05:29 +00:30 | 17:10 -00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 22:50 | 05:02 -00:10 | 22:39 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 27:42 | 05:28 +00:29 | 27:41 +00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 33:39 | 05:26 +00:10 | 33:09 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 39:15 | 05:39 +00:02 | 38:35 +00:40 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 44:56 | 04:52 +00:00 | 44:14 +00:42 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 49:48 | 05:30 +00:10 | 49:06 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 55:28 | 02:13 -00:15 | 54:36 +00:52 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 57:26 | 05:29 +02:14 | 56:49 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:20 | 01:05:09 | 05:12 -00:52 | 01:02:18 +02:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:48 | 01:09:29 | 06:07 +00:41 | 01:07:30 +01:59 |
| Wall Balls | 05:23 | 01:16:17 | 06:39 -01:16 | 01:13:37 +02:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:46 | 01:27:18 | 07:02 -01:16 | 01:27:18 |
In terms of pacing, Matthew's overall running time of 00:47:36 was 05:39 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running endurance. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:35 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running, but may need to work on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race.
Overall, Matthew Mcreynolds has shown potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running endurance, speed, and efficiency in transitions, he can further enhance his performance. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to address his weaknesses will help him excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| König Felix | 2022 Hamburg | 01:27:13 | |
| Johns Morgan | 2024 Perth | 01:27:32 | |
| Asheshov William | 2023 Valencia | 01:27:09 | |
| Collier Simon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:57 | |
| Mcgehee Austin | 2024 Dallas | 01:27:04 | |
| Visser Remco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:07 | |
| Jones Brent | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:27:15 | |
| Alsenlid Fredrik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:27:39 | |
| Murphy Kevin | 2021 Dallas | 01:27:35 | |
| Gerdingh Martijn | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:16:38 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:25:03 | |
| 2022 Dallas | 01:21:52 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:28:16 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:33:01 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:26:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
