Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Las Vegas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 419 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marks Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marks Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marks Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marks Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:24 | 09:39 to 07:15 | 43.6% |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 06:19 to 03:56 | 43.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 07:17 to 06:44 | 10.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:31 to 05:23 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:41 to 04:39 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:50 to 39:50 | 0.0% |
| Marks Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:41 | 04:17 -00:06 | 04:19 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 07:52 | 04:47 -00:06 | 08:36 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 06:19 | 12:33 | 04:02 +02:17 | 13:23 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 18:52 | 05:16 -00:06 | 17:25 +01:27 |
| Sled Pull | 07:17 | 24:02 | 07:15 +00:02 | 22:41 +01:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 31:19 | 05:15 -00:06 | 29:56 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:10 | 36:28 | 04:52 -00:42 | 35:11 +01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 40:38 | 05:24 -00:06 | 40:03 +00:35 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 45:56 | 04:39 +00:02 | 45:27 +00:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 50:37 | 05:16 -00:10 | 50:06 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 55:43 | 02:30 -00:08 | 55:22 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 58:05 | 05:23 -00:20 | 57:52 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:03:08 | 05:37 -00:06 | 01:03:15 -00:07 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:08:39 | 05:58 -00:13 | 01:08:52 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 09:39 | 01:14:24 | 07:40 +01:59 | 01:14:50 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 05:08 | 01:29:04 | 06:34 -01:26 | 01:29:04 |
Chris performed particularly well in the running segments, with his total running time being 02:33 faster than the average time. This suggests that he has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on improving his running performance. His best running lap was 00:03:41, which was 00:55 faster than average.
By following these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises and drills, Chris can work towards improving his overall performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moser Marvin | 2022 Hamburg | 01:29:01 | |
| Van Oudenallen Ruud | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:42 | |
| Wassall Matt | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:27 | |
| Mandel Kim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:11 | |
| Brian Ryan | 2023 London | 01:29:34 | |
| Nanos Niko | 2024 Köln | 01:29:02 | |
| Baukrowitz Nils | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:29:03 | |
| Tarhai Ladislav | 2022 Basel | 01:28:49 | |
| Weisdorfer Patrick | 2023 Chicago | 01:29:10 | |
| Kallsen Hajo | 2019 Hamburg | 01:28:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Chicago | 01:29:20 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:27:07 | |
| 2022 Dallas | 01:34:37 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:30:00 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:40:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
