Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 926 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Higgs Samuel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Higgs Samuel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Higgs Samuel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Higgs Samuel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 16:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 16:30 | 01:06:56 to 50:26 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:26 to 06:26 | 0.0% |
| Higgs Samuel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 05:20 -01:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:36 | 04:45 -00:24 | 05:20 -01:44 |
| Running 2 | 10:37 | 07:57 | 05:55 +04:42 | 10:05 -02:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 18:34 | 03:36 -01:14 | 16:00 +02:34 |
| Running 3 | 08:31 | 20:56 | 06:30 +02:01 | 19:36 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 03:44 | 29:27 | 06:19 -02:35 | 26:06 +03:21 |
| Running 4 | 08:44 | 33:11 | 06:30 +02:14 | 32:25 +00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:13 | 41:55 | 07:10 -01:57 | 38:55 +03:00 |
| Running 5 | 08:55 | 47:08 | 06:50 +02:05 | 46:05 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 56:03 | 05:16 -00:28 | 52:55 +03:08 |
| Running 6 | 08:53 | 01:00:51 | 06:35 +02:18 | 58:11 +02:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:09:44 | 02:41 -00:40 | 01:04:46 +04:58 |
| Running 7 | 08:49 | 01:11:45 | 06:34 +02:15 | 01:07:27 +04:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:20:34 | 06:47 -02:16 | 01:14:01 +06:33 |
| Running 8 | 08:54 | 01:25:05 | 07:55 +00:59 | 01:20:48 +04:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:26 | 01:33:59 | 08:53 -02:27 | 01:28:43 +05:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:45 | 01:47:02 | 09:26 -02:41 | 01:47:02 |
Samuel Higgs, competed in the 30-34 age category at the 2024 Manchester event. His overall performance placed him at rank 252 out of 211 athletes, ranking him in the top 119%. In his age group, he placed 64th out of 48 athletes, ranking him in the top 133%. His overall time was 01:47:02. His total running time was 14:45 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement. Samuel showed a strong performance in strength exercises with his Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, and Roxzone times all faster than average. This suggests he has a strength-focused profile. However, his running times were consistently slower than average, indicating room for improvement in this area. His best running lap was 08:31.
Given that Samuel's running times consistently slowed down after the first running segment, it is recommended that he focuses on pacing strategies. Starting too fast can lead to premature fatigue, negatively impacting performance in later segments. Samuel should aim to maintain a steady, sustainable pace throughout the race to conserve energy for the final segments.
As Samuel has shown strength in the strength-focused segments, he should leverage this during the race. However, he should remain aware of the potential fatigue in the running segments that follow these exercises. Transition times between exercises and running segments are crucial to overall performance and these transitions should be practiced during training to improve efficiency and conserve energy.
Lastly, considering the Roxzone time was faster than average, Samuel could potentially benefit from a short recovery period during transitions to maintain a consistent performance throughout the race. However, the length and frequency of these recovery periods should be carefully managed to avoid negatively impacting his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Freudenberger Michael | 2019 Wien | 01:47:13 | |
| Mazitschek Rainer | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:46:58 | |
| Storie Mark | 2024 Birmingham | 01:46:51 | |
| Shum Sam | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:47:32 | |
| Jones Dave | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:31 | |
| Schnitzler Werner | 2023 Wien | 01:46:33 | |
| Rayappan Prathapsingh | 2021 Dallas | 01:46:42 | |
| Keith Nate | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:47:21 | |
| Lee Chun Wang | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:46:52 | |
| Abrie Phillip | 2022 Birmingham | 01:46:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
