Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Elliott James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Elliott James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Elliott James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Elliott James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:28 | 09:18 to 07:50 | 57.5% |
| Run Total | 01:04 | 49:03 to 47:59 | 41.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:42 to 04:41 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Elliott James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:26 | 00:00 | 05:08 +01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 06:26 | 04:40 +00:02 | 05:08 +01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 11:08 | 05:35 +00:05 | 09:48 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 16:48 | 03:25 -00:28 | 15:23 +01:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 19:45 | 06:08 -00:23 | 18:48 +00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 25:30 | 05:54 -01:24 | 24:56 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 30:00 | 06:05 -00:11 | 30:50 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 35:54 | 06:36 -00:51 | 36:55 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 41:39 | 06:22 -00:32 | 43:31 -01:52 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 47:29 | 05:09 -00:16 | 49:53 -02:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 52:22 | 06:12 -00:11 | 55:02 -02:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 58:23 | 02:33 -00:42 | 01:01:14 -02:51 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 01:00:14 | 06:10 -00:10 | 01:03:47 -03:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:06:14 | 06:13 -00:27 | 01:09:57 -03:43 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:12:00 | 07:10 +00:20 | 01:16:10 -04:10 |
| Wall Balls | 09:18 | 01:19:30 | 08:14 +01:04 | 01:23:20 -03:50 |
| Roxzone | 11:30 | 01:40:12 | 08:38 +02:52 | 01:40:12 |
James Elliott's performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox event was commendable, finishing with an overall time of 01:40:12. He ranked in the top 55% both overall and within his age group, showcasing competitive capabilities. His total running time was 00:49:03, making it 00:08 faster than the average, indicating a stronger running profile. This reveals an edge in endurance and pace, though the first running segment suggests a slow start. James excelled in strength-based exercises, particularly the sled push, sled pull, and farmer's carry, ranking within the top 30% for these segments.
The Roxzone was a significant area for improvement, being 02:58 slower than average. To enhance transitions, James should focus on overall fitness and transition efficiency. Incorporate drills such as:
This segment was 01:09 slower than average. To improve, focus on:
Despite being faster than average, there's room to gain 02:15 compared to the 25th percentile. Focus on:
Improvement can be achieved by focusing on:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forslund Jonas | 2024 Malaga | 01:40:15 | |
| Wells Alex | 2024 Manchester | 01:40:32 | |
| Milcent Olivier | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:40:23 | |
| Mejias Pedro | 2024 Glasgow | 01:39:44 | |
| Poggioli Fabio | 2024 Turin | 01:40:23 | |
| Tohid Munir | 2024 Singapore | 01:40:37 | |
| Augustynowicz Andrzej | 2024 Poznan | 01:39:46 | |
| Newby Scott | 2024 Dublin | 01:40:36 | |
| Ruiterman Patrick | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:39:49 | |
| Bertuccio Giovanni Eddy | 2024 Rimini | 01:40:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
