Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 639 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sieger Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sieger Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sieger Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sieger Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:17 | 01:03:20 to 52:03 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:21 to 07:21 | 0.0% |
| Sieger Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 05:29 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:55 | 04:48 -00:12 | 05:29 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 06:21 | 10:31 | 06:02 +00:19 | 10:17 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 16:52 | 03:43 -01:30 | 16:19 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 07:25 | 19:05 | 06:44 +00:41 | 20:02 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 26:30 | 06:35 -01:54 | 26:46 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 08:00 | 31:11 | 06:43 +01:17 | 33:21 -02:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:51 | 39:11 | 07:42 -02:51 | 40:04 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 08:15 | 44:02 | 07:05 +01:10 | 47:46 -03:44 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 52:17 | 05:23 -00:32 | 54:51 -02:34 |
| Running 6 | 08:24 | 57:08 | 06:51 +01:33 | 01:00:14 -03:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 01:05:32 | 02:44 -00:15 | 01:07:05 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 08:39 | 01:08:01 | 06:48 +01:51 | 01:09:49 -01:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 01:16:40 | 07:02 -01:12 | 01:16:37 +00:03 |
| Running 8 | 10:24 | 01:22:30 | 08:32 +01:52 | 01:23:39 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:21 | 01:32:54 | 09:18 -01:57 | 01:32:11 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 11:39 | 01:51:46 | 10:17 +01:22 | 01:51:46 |
Splits Analysis:
Analyzing the individual splits, it is evident that Daniel Sieger's running performance was slightly slower than average in most segments. His best running lap was 00:05:55, which was 37 seconds slower than the average. The segments where he lost the most time were Running 7, Running 8, Running 6, Roxzone, Running 4, Running 5, Running 3, Running 1, Best Lap, and Running 2.
In conclusion, while Daniel Sieger performed well overall in the 2020 Karlsruhe Hyrox race, there are areas that require improvement, particularly in his running performance and transition efficiency. By incorporating specific training strategies, such as interval running, strength training, and efficient transitions, he can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sieger Daniel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:51:46 | |
| Reddehase Alexander | 2023 Hamburg | 01:52:00 | |
| Swain Jack | 2022 Manchester | 01:51:56 | |
| Montelongo Melian Jose Domingo | 2023 Malaga | 01:52:09 | |
| Bath Jatinder | 2022 London | 01:52:00 | |
| Peh Zhen Hui | 2023 Singapore | 01:52:01 | |
| Phua Alvin | 2023 Singapore | 01:52:01 | |
| Aldred Michael | 2024 Manchester | 01:51:38 | |
| Grewal Jerry | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:52:04 | |
| Long Henry | 2024 Cape Town | 01:51:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
