Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 466 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ruelas Thelma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ruelas Thelma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ruelas Thelma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ruelas Thelma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:43 | 09:25 to 06:42 | 47.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 08:02 to 07:09 | 15.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:48 | 06:18 to 05:30 | 14.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:47 | 03:29 to 02:42 | 13.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 08:27 to 08:09 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 06:05 to 05:50 | 4.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:59 to 05:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:45 to 50:45 | 0.0% |
| Ruelas Thelma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:49 | 00:00 | 05:57 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:18 | 06:49 | 05:29 +00:49 | 05:57 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 13:07 | 06:26 -00:51 | 11:26 +01:41 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 18:42 | 03:20 -00:05 | 17:52 +00:50 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 21:57 | 06:43 -00:34 | 21:12 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 08:02 | 28:06 | 07:14 +00:48 | 27:55 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 36:08 | 06:53 -00:47 | 35:09 +00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:27 | 42:14 | 08:23 +00:04 | 42:02 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:14 | 50:41 | 07:10 -00:56 | 50:25 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 06:05 | 56:55 | 05:51 +00:14 | 57:35 -00:40 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 01:03:00 | 06:58 -00:41 | 01:03:26 -00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:29 | 01:09:17 | 02:43 +00:46 | 01:10:24 -01:07 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 01:12:46 | 06:56 -00:27 | 01:13:07 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:19:15 | 06:11 -00:12 | 01:20:03 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:25:14 | 07:46 -00:37 | 01:26:14 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 09:25 | 01:32:23 | 06:50 +02:35 | 01:34:00 -01:37 |
| Roxzone | 08:36 | 01:50:17 | 09:27 -00:51 | 01:50:17 |
Thelma Ruelas delivered an impressive performance in the Hyrox race. Her overall ranking placed her in the top 17% of 1320 athletes, and she also ranked in the top 19% in her age group. Her total running time was faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her roxzone time was slightly faster than average suggesting the need for improving transition times and overall fitness. Thelma appeared to start slower than average during the first running segment but picked up pace in the following segments, indicating a possible need for better pacing strategy to avoid slow starts.
Thelma should consider implementing the following strategies to improve her race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Semple Amanda | 2024 Dallas | 01:49:58 | |
| Kremser Sabine | 2018 Wien | 01:50:03 | |
| Welter Viktorija | 2024 Dublin | 01:50:12 | |
| Daniels Emma | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:49:57 | |
| Le May Katie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:50:36 | |
| Narbutaite Vaida | 2024 Stockholm | 01:50:29 | |
| Delarue Eva | 2024 Marseille | 01:50:34 | |
| Struckmann Kim Jennifer | 2024 Köln | 01:49:50 | |
| Poon Yeng Yeng | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:50:35 | |
| 赵 祎宁 | 2024 Beijing | 01:50:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
