Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 232 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gibbs Torquil's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gibbs Torquil's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gibbs Torquil's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gibbs Torquil's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:52 | 15:11 to 10:19 | 48.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:04 | 11:30 to 08:26 | 30.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 08:07 to 07:19 | 8.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:46 | 05:47 to 05:01 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 06:04 to 05:34 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:46 to 07:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 54:02 to 54:02 | 0.0% |
| Gibbs Torquil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:33 | 00:00 | 06:05 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:47 | 06:33 | 04:59 +00:48 | 06:05 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 08:40 | 12:20 | 06:35 +02:05 | 11:04 +01:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 21:00 | 04:00 -00:55 | 17:39 +03:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 24:05 | 07:30 -01:18 | 21:39 +02:26 |
| Sled Pull | 08:07 | 30:17 | 07:26 +00:41 | 29:09 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:20 | 38:24 | 07:41 -01:21 | 36:35 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 11:30 | 44:44 | 09:02 +02:28 | 44:16 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 56:14 | 07:53 -01:31 | 53:18 +02:56 |
| Rowing | 06:04 | 01:02:36 | 05:37 +00:27 | 01:01:11 +01:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 01:08:40 | 07:42 -01:27 | 01:06:48 +01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:05 | 01:14:55 | 03:03 +00:02 | 01:14:30 +00:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 01:18:00 | 07:42 -01:18 | 01:17:33 +00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:46 | 01:24:24 | 08:30 -00:44 | 01:25:15 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 07:19 | 01:32:10 | 09:56 -02:37 | 01:33:45 -01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 15:11 | 01:39:29 | 11:25 +03:46 | 01:43:41 -04:12 |
| Roxzone | 12:03 | 02:06:34 | 11:28 +00:35 | 02:06:34 |
Torquil Gibbs showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX event considering his age category, ranking 7 out of 10 athletes. His overall rank was 749, placing him in the top 96% of 774 athletes. He demonstrated an impressive running ability, with his total running time being 07:16 faster than the average. His best running lap was clocked at 00:06:12, pointing to his strength as a runner. However, his roxzone time, which includes transitions and rests between exercise zones, was slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement.
Based on his performance, Torquil should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Witte Dyon | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 02:06:10 | |
| Arevalo Ignacio | 2024 Madrid | 02:06:47 | |
| Chandler Martyn | 2023 Barcelona | 02:06:18 | |
| Ng David | 2023 Hong Kong | 02:06:56 | |
| Müller Andre | 2018 Wien | 02:06:24 | |
| Baier Helmut | 2022 Leipzig | 02:06:06 | |
| Harriott Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 02:06:25 | |
| Younan Sargon | 2023 Melbourne | 02:06:43 | |
| Dolan Neil | 2023 Manchester | 02:06:15 | |
| Whiteford Douglas | 2024 Glasgow | 02:06:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 02:02:59 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 02:02:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
