Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
264 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 264 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 264 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 264 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
10:55.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 264 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Daniel Fiore's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race placed him in the top 61% overall and top 69% in his age group. His total race time was 02:04:51, with a total running time of 01:04:16, which is 02:46 slower than the average. This indicates a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. Despite this, Daniel showcased significant strength in segments like the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he was notably faster than average, indicating a strong strength-based profile. His pacing strategy seems to have been conservative at the start (Running 1 to Running 4), suggesting he might have started too slowly.
Segments to Improve
Running Performance: Given the slower total running time, Daniel should focus on increasing running efficiency and speed. Incorporate interval training and tempo runs to enhance aerobic capacity and speed. Consider fartlek sessions to simulate race conditions with varied intensity.
Burpees Broad Jump: Daniel's time here was 01:32 slower than average. Focus on improving explosive power and endurance with plyometric exercises like box jumps and burpee variations. Emphasize proper form to enhance efficiency and speed.
Sandbag Lunges: With a time 00:36 slower than average, Daniel should work on leg endurance and stability. Include exercises such as lunges with varying weights and step-ups to build leg strength and control.
Wall Balls: Although faster than average, this segment still has room for improvement. Practice with varying weights and heights to build endurance and accuracy. Focus on maintaining consistent breathing patterns to avoid fatigue.
Race Strategies
Optimize Transitions: While Daniel's roxzone time was faster than average, continuous improvement can be achieved by practicing transitions between exercises. Set up mock transitions during training to develop a rhythm and minimize downtime.
Refined Pacing: Starting too slow may have impacted overall performance. Implement a more even pacing strategy with a slight increase in pace during the initial runs (Running 1 to Running 4) to improve overall time.
Focus on Compromised Running: Train specifically for running immediately after strength exercises. Incorporate exercises like tire flips or sled drags followed by short running bursts to simulate race conditions.