Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 473 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Collings Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Collings Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Collings Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Collings Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:54 | 01:00:29 to 53:35 | 75.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:44 | 09:33 to 07:49 | 18.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 07:42 to 07:11 | 5.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:59 to 02:56 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Collings Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 05:36 -01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 03:59 | 04:53 -00:45 | 05:36 -01:37 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 08:07 | 06:17 -00:13 | 10:29 -02:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:39 | 14:11 | 03:54 -00:15 | 16:46 -02:35 |
| Running 3 | 06:59 | 17:50 | 07:01 -00:02 | 20:40 -02:50 |
| Sled Pull | 06:01 | 24:49 | 06:49 -00:48 | 27:41 -02:52 |
| Running 4 | 07:21 | 30:50 | 07:05 +00:16 | 34:30 -03:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:33 | 38:11 | 08:12 +01:21 | 41:35 -03:24 |
| Running 5 | 09:52 | 47:44 | 07:24 +02:28 | 49:47 -02:03 |
| Rowing | 05:07 | 57:36 | 05:28 -00:21 | 57:11 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 08:54 | 01:02:43 | 07:05 +01:49 | 01:02:39 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:59 | 01:11:37 | 02:51 +00:08 | 01:09:44 +01:53 |
| Running 7 | 07:47 | 01:14:36 | 07:07 +00:40 | 01:12:35 +02:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:42 | 01:22:23 | 07:31 +00:11 | 01:19:42 +02:41 |
| Running 8 | 09:37 | 01:30:05 | 09:02 +00:35 | 01:27:13 +02:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:39:42 | 09:55 -03:39 | 01:36:15 +03:27 |
| Roxzone | 10:54 | 01:56:46 | 10:36 +00:18 | 01:56:46 |
Kyle Collings demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, ranking in the top 55% overall and top 46% in his age group. His standout performances were in the Ski Erg and Wall Balls, where he ranked in the top percentile. However, his total running time was slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance. Kyle started the race strong, as evidenced by his fast split in Running 1, but his pace slowed significantly in later running segments, suggesting he may have started too fast. His profile leans towards a hybrid athlete, with strengths in certain strength elements but needing balanced improvement in both running and other strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lay Calvin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:57:07 | |
| Abdelli Amor | 2023 Paris | 01:56:33 | |
| Behnisch Markus | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:56:53 | |
| Chan Boon Kian | 2024 Melbourne | 01:57:01 | |
| De Haan Roy | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:57:06 | |
| Van Rijswijk Wim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:57:01 | |
| Lukas Alexander | 2023 Dallas | 01:56:19 | |
| Roed Kierkegaard Jakob | 2024 Malaga | 01:57:14 | |
| Miranda Vittorio | 2024 Milan | 01:56:57 | |
| Viannei Massimo | 2024 Turin | 01:56:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
