Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 242 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chungue Joshua's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chungue Joshua's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chungue Joshua's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chungue Joshua's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:37 | 14:23 to 07:46 | 77.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 11:22 to 10:19 | 12.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 07:47 to 07:19 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:51 to 05:34 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 03:13 to 03:07 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:43 to 06:43 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 56:11 to 56:11 | 0.0% |
| Chungue Joshua | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:55 | 00:00 | 05:51 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:55 | 04:57 -00:01 | 05:51 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 10:51 | 06:41 -00:48 | 10:48 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 16:44 | 03:55 -01:18 | 17:29 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 19:21 | 07:31 -01:21 | 21:24 -02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 07:47 | 25:31 | 07:13 +00:34 | 28:55 -03:24 |
| Running 4 | 07:08 | 33:18 | 07:33 -00:25 | 36:08 -02:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:43 | 40:26 | 08:54 -02:11 | 43:41 -03:15 |
| Running 5 | 07:53 | 47:09 | 08:06 -00:13 | 52:35 -05:26 |
| Rowing | 05:51 | 55:02 | 05:39 +00:12 | 01:00:41 -05:39 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 01:00:53 | 07:43 -01:17 | 01:06:20 -05:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:13 | 01:07:19 | 03:07 +00:06 | 01:14:03 -06:44 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:10:32 | 07:47 -00:43 | 01:17:10 -06:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 14:23 | 01:17:36 | 08:25 +05:58 | 01:24:57 -07:21 |
| Running 8 | 09:45 | 01:31:59 | 09:57 -00:12 | 01:33:22 -01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 11:22 | 01:41:44 | 10:54 +00:28 | 01:43:19 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 12:42 | 02:05:41 | 11:28 +01:14 | 02:05:41 |
Joshua Chungue demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, ranking in the top 61% overall and top 53% in his age group. His total running time was notably 5:19 faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. The consistent improvement in running times across segments suggests Joshua has a natural aptitude for endurance and speed. However, his performance in strength-based exercises, particularly the Sandbag Lunges, indicates a need for improvement in these areas. Joshua's pacing was well-managed, with a faster start in the middle running segments, but a relatively slower first segment indicates a potential for a more aggressive start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Massar Philipp | 2019 Nürnberg | 02:05:41 | |
| Martinez Guillermo | 2024 Bilbao | 02:05:14 | |
| Garcia Sergio | 2024 Houston | 02:06:02 | |
| GarcíaMonco Carra Fernando | 2024 Madrid | 02:05:41 | |
| Pakoejoe Elmer | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:06:04 | |
| Chungue Joshua | 2024 Melbourne | 02:05:41 | |
| Kozowski Micha | 2024 Gdansk | 02:05:39 | |
| Hotton Myles | 2022 London | 02:05:31 | |
| Jankowski Kay | 2024 New York | 02:05:16 | |
| Sanchez Hernandez Luis Ricardo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:05:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:43:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
