Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 243 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pakoejoe Elmer's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pakoejoe Elmer's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pakoejoe Elmer's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pakoejoe Elmer's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:29 | 01:02:52 to 56:23 | 71.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:18 | 09:04 to 07:46 | 14.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:29 | 05:30 to 05:01 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 07:43 to 07:19 | 4.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 08:44 to 08:26 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:43 to 05:34 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:19 to 09:19 | 0.0% |
| Pakoejoe Elmer | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:09 | 00:00 | 05:54 -01:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:30 | 04:09 | 04:57 +00:33 | 05:54 -01:45 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 09:39 | 06:37 -00:13 | 10:51 -01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 16:03 | 03:55 -01:29 | 17:28 -01:25 |
| Running 3 | 07:08 | 18:29 | 07:25 -00:17 | 21:23 -02:54 |
| Sled Pull | 07:43 | 25:37 | 07:09 +00:34 | 28:48 -03:11 |
| Running 4 | 08:03 | 33:20 | 07:32 +00:31 | 35:57 -02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:44 | 41:23 | 08:59 -00:15 | 43:29 -02:06 |
| Running 5 | 08:28 | 50:07 | 07:59 +00:29 | 52:28 -02:21 |
| Rowing | 05:43 | 58:35 | 05:38 +00:05 | 01:00:27 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 07:53 | 01:04:18 | 07:41 +00:12 | 01:06:05 -01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:12:11 | 03:06 -00:51 | 01:13:46 -01:35 |
| Running 7 | 07:39 | 01:14:26 | 07:42 -00:03 | 01:16:52 -02:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:04 | 01:22:05 | 08:39 +00:25 | 01:24:34 -02:29 |
| Running 8 | 13:12 | 01:31:09 | 09:52 +03:20 | 01:33:13 -02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 09:19 | 01:44:21 | 11:27 -02:08 | 01:43:05 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 12:32 | 02:06:04 | 11:32 +01:00 | 02:06:04 |
Elmer Pakoejoe delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank in the top 69% of participants and a respectable position within his age group. Elmer's overall time was 02:06:04, indicating consistent effort throughout the race. His running profile suggests he has a balanced mix of running and strength capabilities, with a total running time of 01:02:52, slightly slower than the average. This indicates potential for improvement in running efficiency. Elmer started the race with an impressive pace in the first running segment, but his pacing slowed in subsequent segments, suggesting he may have started too fast.
By focusing on these areas and implementing suggested training strategies, Elmer can significantly enhance his performance in future Hyrox events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Friedrich Joachim | 2020 Karlsruhe | 02:05:53 | |
| Chavez Tim | 2024 Anaheim | 02:06:17 | |
| Pein Thomas | 2019 Hamburg | 02:05:46 | |
| Wildeboer Harry | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 02:06:13 | |
| Conway Damien | 2024 Melbourne | 02:05:37 | |
| Rentería Murillo Adrian | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:05:34 | |
| Nicola Jean | 2024 Köln | 02:06:17 | |
| Conetta Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 02:06:17 | |
| Grieben Björn | 2019 Hannover | 02:05:38 | |
| Marsenat Newton | 2023 New York | 02:06:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
