Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Jeff's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Jeff's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Jeff's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Jeff's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:32 | 54:22 to 48:50 | 91.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 03:43 to 03:29 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 06:26 to 06:13 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:48 to 04:43 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:59 to 07:59 | 0.0% |
| Smith Jeff | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 05:12 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:03 | 04:42 +00:06 | 05:12 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 06:36 | 09:51 | 05:42 +00:54 | 09:54 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 16:27 | 03:28 +00:15 | 15:36 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 07:06 | 20:10 | 06:16 +00:50 | 19:04 +01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 27:16 | 06:04 -01:08 | 25:20 +01:56 |
| Running 4 | 07:09 | 32:12 | 06:15 +00:54 | 31:24 +00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 39:21 | 06:53 -00:51 | 37:39 +01:42 |
| Running 5 | 07:17 | 45:23 | 06:31 +00:46 | 44:32 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 52:40 | 05:11 -00:25 | 51:03 +01:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 57:26 | 06:20 +00:32 | 56:14 +01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:04:18 | 02:36 -00:40 | 01:02:34 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:54 | 01:06:14 | 06:19 +00:35 | 01:05:10 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:26 | 01:13:08 | 06:25 +00:01 | 01:11:29 +01:39 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:19:34 | 07:25 +00:05 | 01:17:54 +01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:59 | 01:27:04 | 08:15 -00:16 | 01:25:19 +01:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:40 | 01:42:35 | 09:01 -01:21 | 01:42:35 |
Jeff Smith demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. He finished in the top 44% of all athletes and in the top 50% of his age group (50-54) - a laudable feat considering the competitiveness of this race. His overall time was 01:42:35, with a total running time of 00:54:22, which was 04:12 slower than the average time. This indicates that Jeff has more of a strength-oriented profile, as his running time was slower than average.
Looking at his pacing strategy, Jeff started the race running slightly faster than the average pace, but as the race progressed, his running splits were consistently slower than average. This could suggest that he may have started too fast, leading to a decrease in speed in the later stages of the race.
Considering Jeff's performance, some strategies he could implement include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martiniault Nicolas | 2023 Paris | 01:42:21 | |
| 한 상준 | 2024 Incheon | 01:42:24 | |
| Han Dickson | 2023 Singapore | 01:42:20 | |
| Bernat Serrano Alejandro | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:12 | |
| Watkin David | 2022 Birmingham | 01:43:00 | |
| Cejudo Gutiérrez Gustavo | 2022 Valencia | 01:42:16 | |
| Evans Aled | 2024 Manchester | 01:42:55 | |
| Mccarthy Padraig | 2024 Berlin | 01:42:17 | |
| Sham Alain | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:43:02 | |
| Collins Phil | 2020 Hannover | 01:42:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
