Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smaali Nasser's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smaali Nasser's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smaali Nasser's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smaali Nasser's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:29 | 42:47 to 38:18 | 86.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 04:52 to 04:14 | 12.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:26 to 02:22 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Smaali Nasser | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:49 | 03:36 | 04:20 -00:31 | 04:19 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 07:25 | 04:37 +00:34 | 08:39 -01:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 12:36 | 02:40 -00:14 | 13:16 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 15:02 | 05:00 +00:19 | 15:56 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 20:21 | 04:27 -00:56 | 20:56 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 23:52 | 04:59 +00:22 | 25:23 -01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:52 | 29:13 | 04:39 +00:13 | 30:22 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 34:05 | 05:07 +00:41 | 35:01 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 04:14 | 39:53 | 04:39 -00:25 | 40:08 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 44:07 | 05:01 +00:42 | 44:47 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 49:50 | 02:01 -00:27 | 49:48 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 51:24 | 05:00 +00:39 | 51:49 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:49 | 57:03 | 04:34 -00:45 | 56:49 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 06:13 | 01:00:52 | 05:26 +00:47 | 01:01:23 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 01:07:05 | 05:45 -01:26 | 01:06:49 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:14 | 01:18:30 | 05:56 +01:18 | 01:18:30 |
Nasser Smaali performed commendably at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 611 out of 3118 athletes, and placing in the top 23% of his age group. His performance highlights his proficiency in strength-based exercises, as evidenced by his outstanding segments in Ski Erg and Wall Balls, where he ranked in the top 2% and 6% respectively. However, his overall running time was slower than average, suggesting a need to focus on improving his running efficiency and endurance. The pacing analysis indicates that Nasser started strong, with excellent initial running segments, but his performance tapered off, pointing towards potential fatigue or pacing misjudgment.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Orwa Kai | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:24 | |
| Shortall Brian | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:34 | |
| Schohn Irénée | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:18:57 | |
| Banwell Guy | 2023 London | 01:18:51 | |
| Maceachern Duncan | 2024 Paris | 01:18:32 | |
| Taylor David | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:13 | |
| Evans Ross | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:48 | |
| Mohr Marcel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:04 | |
| Boyce Nicky | 2024 London | 01:18:12 | |
| Punton David | 2022 Manchester | 01:18:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
