Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quines Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quines Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quines Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quines Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:41 | 47:09 to 44:28 | 85.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 05:22 to 05:08 | 7.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 03:09 to 03:00 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:33 to 04:31 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:56 to 04:54 | 1.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 05:22 to 05:21 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Quines Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:58 | 00:00 | 04:50 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:58 | 04:33 +00:00 | 04:50 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 10:31 | 05:19 +00:04 | 09:23 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 15:54 | 03:08 +00:01 | 14:42 +01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 19:03 | 05:47 -00:02 | 17:50 +01:13 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 24:48 | 05:23 -00:01 | 23:37 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 30:10 | 05:45 -00:23 | 29:00 +01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 35:32 | 05:59 -01:14 | 34:45 +00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 40:17 | 05:58 -00:28 | 40:44 -00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 45:47 | 04:58 -00:02 | 46:42 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 50:43 | 05:48 +01:23 | 51:40 -00:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 57:54 | 02:22 -00:08 | 57:28 +00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:00:08 | 05:46 -00:11 | 59:50 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:05:43 | 05:35 -00:13 | 01:05:36 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:11:05 | 06:34 -00:07 | 01:11:11 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:17:32 | 07:13 -02:02 | 01:17:45 -00:13 |
| Roxzone | 10:01 | 01:32:38 | 07:40 +02:21 | 01:32:38 |
Mark Quines performed well in the Hyrox race, finishing in the top 37% of all athletes and in the top 40% of his age group. His overall time of 01:32:38 is commendable. However, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance.
Pacing and Profile:
Mark's total running time of 00:47:09 is 03:02 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:22 suggests that he has a strong running profile. However, his slower overall running time compared to the average indicates that he could benefit from more specific running training.
In conclusion, Mark Quines performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, running speed, and transition time, he can optimize his race performance. Implementing specific training strategies, drills, and techniques tailored to address the identified areas of improvement will help him reach his full potential.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Mark | 2023 Wien | 01:33:06 | |
| Cueva Yannick | 2024 Taipei | 01:33:01 | |
| Perry David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:09 | |
| Worms Nick | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:32:44 | |
| Kipp Nicholas | 2021 Chicago | 01:32:52 | |
| Townsend Jahmai | 2022 London | 01:32:58 | |
| Gudat Falk | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:10 | |
| Van Den Boom Sjoerd | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:58 | |
| Thomas Jesse | 2024 Dallas | 01:32:10 | |
| Stigliano Giuseppe Antonio | 2024 Milan | 01:33:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Anaheim | 01:40:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
