Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Worms Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Worms Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Worms Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Worms Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:30 | 46:58 to 44:28 | 47.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 07:13 to 05:40 | 29.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:02 | 06:23 to 05:21 | 19.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:40 to 04:31 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Worms Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 04:50 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:55 | 04:33 +00:07 | 04:50 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 09:35 | 05:18 -00:03 | 09:23 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 14:50 | 03:08 -00:53 | 14:41 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 17:05 | 05:47 -00:03 | 17:49 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 22:49 | 05:23 -00:17 | 23:36 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 27:55 | 05:46 +00:22 | 28:59 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:13 | 34:03 | 06:00 +01:13 | 34:45 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 41:16 | 05:57 +00:11 | 40:45 +00:31 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 47:24 | 04:58 -00:16 | 46:42 +00:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 52:06 | 05:48 +00:29 | 51:40 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 58:23 | 02:21 -00:29 | 57:28 +00:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 01:00:15 | 05:46 +00:20 | 59:49 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:23 | 01:06:21 | 05:36 +00:47 | 01:05:35 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:28 | 01:12:44 | 06:33 -00:05 | 01:11:11 +01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:19:12 | 07:14 -00:47 | 01:17:44 +01:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:32:44 | 07:46 -00:34 | 01:32:44 |
It is worth noting that Nick's total running time of 00:46:58 was 02:51 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to work on his running performance and endurance. However, his best running lap of 00:04:55 suggests that he has the ability to improve his running speed.
In conclusion, Nick Worms showed a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific segments for improvement, implementing targeted training strategies and techniques, and adopting effective race strategies, Nick can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzalez Gabe | 2019 Miami | 01:32:54 | |
| O Donaile Sean | 2024 Bilbao | 01:32:27 | |
| Brant Klaus | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:08 | |
| Schols Martijn | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:32:57 | |
| Diaz Romero De La Cruz Javier | 2021 Madrid | 01:33:00 | |
| Fuchs Andreas | 2023 Barcelona | 01:32:59 | |
| Hofer Sébastien | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:33:10 | |
| Oehlert Robert | 2021 Leipzig | 01:32:50 | |
| Sazali Syazwan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:32:23 | |
| Poulhazan Sebastien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:32:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
