Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pellissier Allyson's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pellissier Allyson's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pellissier Allyson's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pellissier Allyson's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:11 | 53:06 to 46:55 | 97.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:16 to 05:08 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Pellissier Allyson | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 05:16 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 04:51 | 05:11 +00:05 | 05:16 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 10:07 | 05:39 +00:22 | 10:27 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 16:08 | 02:52 -00:24 | 16:06 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:40 | 18:36 | 05:59 +00:41 | 18:58 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 25:16 | 06:03 -01:32 | 24:57 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:52 | 29:47 | 05:59 +00:53 | 31:00 -01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:48 | 36:39 | 06:37 -01:49 | 36:59 -00:20 |
| Running 5 | 07:16 | 41:27 | 06:10 +01:06 | 43:36 -02:09 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 48:43 | 05:27 -00:17 | 49:46 -01:03 |
| Running 6 | 07:01 | 53:53 | 06:03 +00:58 | 55:13 -01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:00:54 | 02:22 -00:20 | 01:01:16 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 07:10 | 01:02:56 | 06:02 +01:08 | 01:03:38 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 01:10:06 | 05:03 -01:05 | 01:09:40 +00:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:18 | 01:14:04 | 06:33 +00:45 | 01:14:43 -00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:12 | 01:21:22 | 05:18 -01:06 | 01:21:16 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 08:26 | 01:33:52 | 07:18 +01:08 | 01:33:52 |
Allyson Pellissier showcased an impressive performance, achieving an overall rank of 306 in a pool of 1404 athletes. She ranked in the top 23% of her age group (35-39), demonstrating her competitive edge. However, her total running time was slower than the average, indicating potential room for improvement in her running capabilities. While her strength segments were generally better than her running performance, there was a notable drop in her performance in the Roxzone segment. This suggests that she may need to work on her overall fitness and transition times. Her pacing seemed to be uneven, starting stronger but slowing down as the race progressed.
Implementing the following race strategies can help Allyson improve her performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrikopoulos Freda | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:36 | |
| Dieudonné Eva | 2024 Paris | 01:33:55 | |
| Juarez Sonia | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:34:14 | |
| Wan Yvonne | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:22 | |
| Tarkian Tillgren Hanna | 2023 Malmö | 01:34:01 | |
| Ross Alice | 2024 Brisbane | 01:33:53 | |
| Hansson Sofia | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:33:44 | |
| Morsink Anna | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:42 | |
| Wright Amy | 2023 Dublin | 01:34:00 | |
| Funk Nicola | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
