Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnamara Gary's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnamara Gary's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnamara Gary's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnamara Gary's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:04 | 07:44 to 05:40 | 34.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:02 | 06:41 to 04:39 | 34.2% |
| Run Total | 00:40 | 40:48 to 40:08 | 11.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 05:01 to 04:22 | 10.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:57 to 02:33 | 6.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:47 to 04:39 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Mcnamara Gary | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:41 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 02:41 | 04:23 -00:19 | 04:29 -01:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 06:45 | 04:49 -00:07 | 08:52 -02:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 11:27 | 02:47 +00:10 | 13:41 -02:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 14:24 | 05:13 -00:05 | 16:28 -02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:01 | 19:32 | 04:41 +00:20 | 21:41 -02:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 24:33 | 05:11 +00:18 | 26:22 -01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:41 | 30:02 | 05:00 +01:41 | 31:33 -01:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 36:43 | 05:21 +00:33 | 36:33 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 42:37 | 04:44 +00:03 | 41:54 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 47:24 | 05:14 +00:29 | 46:38 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 53:07 | 02:07 -00:18 | 51:52 +01:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 54:56 | 05:12 +00:30 | 53:59 +00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 01:00:38 | 04:51 -00:36 | 59:11 +01:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:04:53 | 05:42 -00:09 | 01:04:02 +00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 07:44 | 01:10:26 | 06:10 +01:34 | 01:09:44 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 04:16 | 01:22:18 | 06:24 -02:08 | 01:22:18 |
Based on the splits analysis, Gary's best performance was in the Running 1 segment, where he was 01:39 faster than the average time. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, being 00:16 and 00:09 faster than average, respectively.
However, there were segments where Gary lost time compared to the average. The segments with the most time lost were Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Run Total, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 4. These segments should be the focus of improvement for Gary.
In conclusion, Gary Mcnamara demonstrated strong performance in the HYROX race in Dublin, placing in the top percentages of his age group. However, to further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his time in segments such as Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, as well as working on his overall running endurance and speed. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, along with pacing and transition time improvements, can help him achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon Jack | 2024 Sydney | 01:22:44 | |
| Kirby Paul | 2023 London | 01:22:44 | |
| Cortes Diaz Héctor Javier | 2023 Bilbao | 01:21:48 | |
| Cannarozzo Alessandro | 2024 Milan | 01:22:41 | |
| Schnitger Christopher | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:33 | |
| Grahame Dan | 2024 London | 01:22:01 | |
| Henning Jonathan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:21:57 | |
| Priewe Moritz | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:57 | |
| Borges Jose Antonio | 2022 Madrid | 01:21:55 | |
| Ezkibel Oz | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stockholm | 59:21 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:00:58 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:09:06 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:12:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
