Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcbride Ryan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcbride Ryan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcbride Ryan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcbride Ryan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:11 | 52:44 to 48:33 | 75.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 08:41 to 08:00 | 12.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 06:46 to 06:09 | 11.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:44 to 04:42 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Mcbride Ryan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 04:29 | 04:41 +00:03 | 05:10 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 09:13 | 05:40 +00:23 | 09:51 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 15:16 | 03:30 -01:15 | 15:31 -00:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:57 | 17:31 | 06:16 +00:41 | 19:01 -01:30 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 24:28 | 06:03 -01:54 | 25:17 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 28:37 | 06:14 +00:29 | 31:20 -02:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:01 | 35:20 | 06:47 -00:46 | 37:34 -02:14 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 41:21 | 06:31 +00:34 | 44:21 -03:00 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 48:26 | 05:11 -00:22 | 50:52 -02:26 |
| Running 6 | 07:10 | 53:15 | 06:20 +00:50 | 56:03 -02:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:00:25 | 02:36 -00:17 | 01:02:23 -01:58 |
| Running 7 | 06:56 | 01:02:44 | 06:19 +00:37 | 01:04:59 -02:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:46 | 01:09:40 | 06:19 +00:27 | 01:11:18 -01:38 |
| Running 8 | 07:24 | 01:16:26 | 07:26 -00:02 | 01:17:37 -01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 08:41 | 01:23:50 | 08:16 +00:25 | 01:25:03 -01:13 |
| Roxzone | 09:48 | 01:42:13 | 08:54 +00:54 | 01:42:13 |
Ryan Mcbride, competing in the 35-39 age group, achieved an impressive overall rank of 628 out of 1404 athletes, putting him in the top 44%. His performance shows a strong balance between running and strength-based exercises, placing him in a hybrid profile. He began the race with a faster pace than average, which seems to have resulted in slower times in the later running segments, suggesting a need for better pacing strategy. His total running time was 2:39 slower than the average, indicating an area for potential improvement.
Going forward, Ryan should consider implementing a few key strategies during the race for better performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper Jack | 2022 London | 01:42:10 | |
| Delesalle Bertrand | 2023 Paris | 01:41:46 | |
| Sapalya Sharath | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:59 | |
| Seah Hao Yu | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:41:44 | |
| Van Aalst Wouter | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:42:01 | |
| Torres Guerrero Federico | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:14 | |
| Quarta Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:42:36 | |
| Cogolludo Pérez Francisco Javier | 2023 Madrid | 01:41:55 | |
| Rosel Tom | 2024 Paris | 01:42:42 | |
| Ng Kenric | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:42:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
