Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:08 | 07:09 to 05:01 | 48.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:16 | 05:21 to 04:05 | 28.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 03:01 to 02:23 | 14.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 04:31 to 04:17 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:10 to 02:01 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:08 to 43:08 | 0.0% |
| Green Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:01 | 05:02 -00:16 | 04:58 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 08:47 | 05:18 -00:15 | 10:00 -01:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 13:50 | 02:36 +00:25 | 15:18 -01:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 16:51 | 05:35 -00:14 | 17:54 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 07:09 | 22:12 | 05:26 +01:43 | 23:29 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 29:21 | 05:37 -00:08 | 28:55 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:37 | 34:50 | 05:44 -01:07 | 34:32 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 39:27 | 05:45 -00:10 | 40:16 -00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 45:02 | 05:18 -00:23 | 46:01 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 49:57 | 05:39 +00:03 | 51:19 -01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 55:39 | 02:11 -00:01 | 56:58 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 57:49 | 05:37 +00:21 | 59:09 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:03:47 | 04:31 +00:00 | 01:04:46 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:08:18 | 06:00 +00:03 | 01:09:17 -00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 05:21 | 01:14:21 | 04:43 +00:38 | 01:15:17 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:56 | 01:26:29 | 06:29 +00:27 | 01:26:29 |
Emily Green's performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier HYROX race was impressive. She finished in the top 13% of her age group (35-39) and among all participants, with an overall time of 01:26:29. An analysis of her total running time of 00:43:08 shows that Emily is a strong runner, outpacing the average time by 01:28. This strength was consistently demonstrated in her running splits, where she consistently finished faster than the average time, with the exception of the final two segments.
Emily's race started strong, as she outpaced the average time in the initial running segments, signifying a fast start. However, she seems to have maintained this pace throughout the race, leading to slower running times by the end. This suggests that Emily's pacing could be improved. Despite this pacing issue, Emily's profile leans more towards being a runner, with her strength segments needing more focus in training.
Emily should focus on implementing the following strategies to improve her overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vasylenko Margaryta | 2023 Stockholm | 01:26:17 | |
| Kantzavelos Nicole | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:54 | |
| René Anaëlle | 2023 Paris | 01:26:38 | |
| Biau Justine | 2023 Paris | 01:26:41 | |
| Baitella Elisa | 2022 Madrid | 01:26:02 | |
| Long Sarah | 2024 London | 01:26:40 | |
| Sheppard Nicole | 2023 Houston | 01:26:17 | |
| Gerber Kathrin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:06 | |
| Schmidt González Sofía | 2024 Mexico City | 01:26:19 | |
| Andani Zuzanna | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:44:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
