Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 658 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Genter Lindsey's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Genter Lindsey's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Genter Lindsey's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Genter Lindsey's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:16 | 55:19 to 52:03 | 91.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:36 to 05:24 | 5.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:15 to 03:11 | 1.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 | 06:14 to 06:12 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:45 to 06:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Genter Lindsey | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 05:41 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:36 | 05:04 | 05:24 +00:12 | 05:41 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 10:40 | 06:16 +00:21 | 11:05 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 17:17 | 03:10 +00:05 | 17:21 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 06:57 | 20:32 | 06:39 +00:18 | 20:31 +00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 27:29 | 06:50 -01:16 | 27:10 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:57 | 33:03 | 06:41 +00:16 | 34:00 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:45 | 40:00 | 07:53 -01:08 | 40:41 -00:41 |
| Running 5 | 07:29 | 46:45 | 06:53 +00:36 | 48:34 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 54:14 | 05:47 -00:24 | 55:27 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 07:22 | 59:37 | 06:45 +00:37 | 01:01:14 -01:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 01:06:59 | 02:34 -00:10 | 01:07:59 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 07:25 | 01:09:23 | 06:45 +00:40 | 01:10:33 -01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:43 | 01:16:48 | 05:51 -01:08 | 01:17:18 -00:30 |
| Running 8 | 07:31 | 01:21:31 | 07:28 +00:03 | 01:23:09 -01:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:29:02 | 06:24 -00:10 | 01:30:37 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 10:39 | 01:45:49 | 08:48 +01:51 | 01:45:49 |
Lindsey Genter's performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event demonstrated a strong capacity for endurance and strength, landing her in the top 32% overall and the top 33% of her age group. Her total running time came in at 01:45 slower than the average, indicating that while she performed well, there is room for improvement in her running. Based on these results, it appears Lindsey's profile is more strength-oriented. Her pacing was a bit inconsistent, as she started faster than the average in the first running segment but slowed down in subsequent running segments.
For future races, Lindsey should consider starting at a slightly slower pace to conserve energy for later segments. This strategy could help improve her performance in the later running segments where she currently slows down. Additionally, focusing on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race could help improve her overall time. She may also want to consider incorporating more strength training into her routine to further enhance her performance in the strength-focused segments of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Metz Jessie | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:30 | |
| Cameron Leah | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:06 | |
| Lees Annie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:45:39 | |
| Brodie Laurel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:13 | |
| Carver Charlotte | 2023 Dublin | 01:45:42 | |
| Ulrich Theresa | 2022 Hamburg | 01:45:41 | |
| Riera Manon | 2024 Paris | 01:46:14 | |
| Maltai Lizan | 2024 Anaheim | 01:46:10 | |
| Byrne Niamh | 2023 Dublin | 01:45:37 | |
| Lyons Abi | 2022 Birmingham | 01:45:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:42:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
