Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dijkstra Kjeld's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dijkstra Kjeld's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dijkstra Kjeld's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dijkstra Kjeld's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:09 | 40:25 to 37:16 | 62.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:47 | 03:02 to 02:15 | 15.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:14 to 01:45 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:25 to 04:10 | 4.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:17 to 04:04 | 4.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 04:09 to 04:01 | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 03:57 to 03:54 | 1.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Dijkstra Kjeld | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:14 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:19 | 04:18 +00:07 | 04:14 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 09:44 | 04:33 +00:18 | 08:32 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 14:35 | 02:37 +00:25 | 13:05 +01:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 17:37 | 04:53 +00:18 | 15:42 +01:55 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 22:48 | 04:21 -00:24 | 20:35 +02:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 26:45 | 04:52 +00:21 | 24:56 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:09 | 31:58 | 04:31 -00:22 | 29:48 +02:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 36:07 | 04:59 +00:06 | 34:19 +01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:23 | 41:12 | 04:36 -00:13 | 39:18 +01:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 45:35 | 04:53 +00:13 | 43:54 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 50:41 | 01:57 +00:17 | 48:47 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 04:42 | 52:55 | 04:52 -00:10 | 50:44 +02:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 57:37 | 04:26 -00:09 | 55:36 +02:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:02 | 01:01:54 | 05:15 -00:13 | 01:00:02 +01:52 |
| Wall Balls | 04:08 | 01:06:56 | 05:37 -01:29 | 01:05:17 +01:39 |
| Roxzone | 05:38 | 01:16:34 | 05:40 -00:02 | 01:16:34 |
In terms of his running performance, Kjeld's total running time was 00:40:25, which was 02:55 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time during the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:42, indicating that he has the potential for faster running times.
To improve Running 1, Kjeld can focus on incorporating interval training into his running routine. This can involve alternating between high-intensity sprints and recovery jogs. Additionally, working on his running form and stride efficiency can help him increase his speed.
For the Ski Erg segment, Kjeld may benefit from practicing specific drills to improve his technique and efficiency on the machine. This could involve focusing on proper body positioning, engaging the core, and maintaining a consistent rhythm.
To address the slower running times in segments like Running 2, Running 4, Running 3, and Running 6, Kjeld should prioritize endurance training. This can include long-distance runs at a steady pace, as well as incorporating tempo runs and hill repeats to build both speed and endurance.
The Farmers Carry segment showed a slower time compared to the average. To improve this, Kjeld can incorporate specific strength training exercises that target grip strength, such as farmer's carries with heavier weights or using a thick grip attachment for dumbbells or barbells.
For the Roxzone segment, Kjeld should focus on improving his overall fitness level and transition time. Incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts, circuit training, and plyometric exercises can help improve his overall fitness and reduce time spent in the roxzone.
Additionally, Kjeld should prioritize proper hydration and nutrition during the race. Staying well-hydrated and fueling with easily digestible carbohydrates can help maintain energy levels and improve performance.
Furthermore, Kjeld should consider practicing transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. This can involve practicing quick and efficient equipment transitions, as well as mentally preparing for the next segment while moving between stations.
Overall, Kjeld Dijkstra had a strong performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running times, addressing specific segments where time was lost, and implementing effective race strategies, he can continue to enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miller Nicholas | 2022 Birmingham | 01:16:12 | |
| Hollis Steven | 2023 London | 01:16:56 | |
| Thomas Jackson | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:36 | |
| Diaz Tejada Hector | 2023 Madrid | 01:16:43 | |
| Fiedler Tommy | 2021 Leipzig | 01:16:31 | |
| Falleroni Mattia | 2024 Rimini | 01:16:57 | |
| Gamble Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:54 | |
| Griffiths Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:39 | |
| Miller Scott | 2024 Sydney | 01:16:39 | |
| Gutierrez Jorge | 2022 Hamburg | 01:16:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:13:29 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
