Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 723 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burn Isobel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burn Isobel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burn Isobel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burn Isobel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:24 | 08:24 to 06:00 | 61.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 03:14 to 02:30 | 18.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 08:00 to 07:25 | 14.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:32 to 05:22 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:42 to 05:40 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:20 to 06:20 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:14 to 50:14 | 0.0% |
| Burn Isobel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:48 | 00:00 | 05:36 +01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:32 | 06:48 | 05:23 +00:09 | 05:36 +01:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 12:20 | 06:10 -00:16 | 10:59 +01:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 18:14 | 03:07 -00:17 | 17:09 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 21:04 | 06:32 -00:25 | 20:16 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 06:20 | 27:11 | 06:44 -00:24 | 26:48 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 33:31 | 06:35 -00:29 | 33:32 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:00 | 39:37 | 07:39 +00:21 | 40:07 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 47:37 | 06:46 -00:34 | 47:46 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:42 | 53:49 | 05:42 +00:00 | 54:32 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 59:31 | 06:40 -00:30 | 01:00:14 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:14 | 01:05:41 | 02:32 +00:42 | 01:06:54 -01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 01:08:55 | 06:38 -00:45 | 01:09:26 -00:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:14:48 | 05:46 -00:33 | 01:16:04 -01:16 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:20:01 | 07:27 -00:21 | 01:21:50 -01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 08:24 | 01:27:07 | 06:07 +02:17 | 01:29:17 -02:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:27 | 01:43:52 | 08:28 -00:01 | 01:43:52 |
Isobel Burn demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. She ranked in the top 24% of her age group and overall athlete categories, reflecting her competitive grasp of the fitness challenge. An impressive aspect of Isobel's performance was her strong running profile, as indicated by her total run time being 02:40 faster than the average. This indicates her effective endurance and speed during the running segments of the race.
She also demonstrated consistency in her pacing, as indicated by her splits from running segments 1 to 4. However, there was a significant decrease in speed in the initial running segment, which could indicate a somewhat slower start compared to the average pace. This slower start may have affected her overall race time. However, she was able to pick up her pace in the subsequent segments, which shows her excellent resilience and adaptability.
In future races, Isobel might consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clapperton Cassie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:43:45 | |
| García Albino Flor | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:44:15 | |
| Hitchings Ellie | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:44:05 | |
| Lenschow Alice | 2019 Hannover | 01:43:46 | |
| Kot Katarzyna | 2024 Malaga | 01:44:01 | |
| Masters Jessica | 2024 Berlin | 01:43:39 | |
| Damgo Cherry | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:35 | |
| Khamis Saadiah | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:59 | |
| Jessen Anita | 2021 Berlin | 01:43:35 | |
| 张 梅 | 2024 Beijing | 01:43:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
