Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 260 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Anger Ashley's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Anger Ashley hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Anger Ashley’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Anger Ashley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:04 | 01:01:23 to 57:19 | 86.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:20 | 07:55 to 07:35 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 03:14 to 02:56 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:48 to 06:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:45 to 08:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:33 to 05:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:42 to 06:42 | 0.0% |
| Anger Ashley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 06:11 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 05:25 | 05:37 -00:28 | 06:11 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 07:18 | 10:34 | 06:47 +00:31 | 11:48 -01:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 17:52 | 03:31 -00:24 | 18:35 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 07:29 | 20:59 | 07:20 +00:09 | 22:06 -01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 06:48 | 28:28 | 07:44 -00:56 | 29:26 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 07:44 | 35:16 | 07:26 +00:18 | 37:10 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:45 | 43:00 | 09:30 -00:45 | 44:36 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 08:10 | 51:45 | 07:42 +00:28 | 54:06 -02:21 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 59:55 | 06:01 -00:28 | 01:01:48 -01:53 |
| Running 6 | 08:17 | 01:05:28 | 07:28 +00:49 | 01:07:49 -02:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:14 | 01:13:45 | 02:50 +00:24 | 01:15:17 -01:32 |
| Running 7 | 08:18 | 01:16:59 | 07:33 +00:45 | 01:18:07 -01:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:25:17 | 07:00 -00:18 | 01:25:40 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:31:59 | 08:56 -00:11 | 01:32:40 -00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 07:55 | 01:40:44 | 07:28 +00:27 | 01:41:36 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 11:09 | 01:59:41 | 10:37 +00:32 | 01:59:41 |
Ashley Anger, in the 35-39 age group, ranked in the top 37% of 1404 athletes overall and in the top 38% of 292 athletes in her age group. This is commendable. Her overall time was 01:59:41. However, her total running time was 01:01:23, which was 01:36 slower than the average. This suggests that Ashley has a more strength-oriented profile and may need to focus more on her running speed. This is further supported by her performance in the first four running segments where she started faster than average but then slowed down. This indicates a potential pacing issue that needs to be addressed.
Based on her performance, Ashley should consider implementing the following strategies during her races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maynard Hannah | 2022 London | 01:59:52 | |
| Rogers Lauren | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:59:37 | |
| Olsson Ginberg Anna | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:59:49 | |
| Gunther Claire | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:59:39 | |
| Lima Pereira Rayssa | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:59:37 | |
| Delwiche Angela | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:59:33 | |
| Georgiou Emmy | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:59:23 | |
| GóreckaWinkler Paulina | 2024 Poznan | 01:59:28 | |
| Domenech Sonia | 2024 Madrid | 02:00:10 | |
| Al Ansari Reem | 2023 Dubai | 01:59:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
