Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 358 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Swartz Elrico's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Swartz Elrico's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Swartz Elrico's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Swartz Elrico's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 11:12 to 07:03 | 59.7% |
| Run Total | 02:31 | 44:37 to 42:06 | 36.2% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:56 to 04:42 | 3.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:34 to 02:31 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:06 to 03:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Swartz Elrico | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:25 -00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:45 | 04:27 -00:08 | 04:25 -00:40 |
| Running 2 | 04:06 | 08:04 | 04:52 -00:46 | 08:52 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 12:10 | 04:12 -01:06 | 13:44 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 08:26 | 15:16 | 05:30 +02:56 | 17:56 -02:40 |
| Sled Pull | 11:12 | 23:42 | 07:27 +03:45 | 23:26 +00:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 34:54 | 05:27 -00:05 | 30:53 +04:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:41 | 40:16 | 05:05 -01:24 | 36:20 +03:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 43:57 | 05:34 +00:13 | 41:25 +02:32 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 49:44 | 04:45 +00:11 | 46:59 +02:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 54:40 | 05:27 +00:07 | 51:44 +02:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 01:00:14 | 02:33 +00:01 | 57:11 +03:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 01:02:48 | 05:32 -00:14 | 59:44 +03:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 01:08:06 | 05:46 -01:18 | 01:05:16 +02:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:12:34 | 06:10 +00:12 | 01:11:02 +01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:03 | 01:18:56 | 07:45 -01:42 | 01:17:12 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:31:49 | 06:52 +00:06 | 01:31:49 |
Elrico Swartz delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox event, finishing with an overall time of 01:31:49. His total running time was 00:44:37, which is 01:47 slower than the average, indicating a slight need to enhance his running endurance. Despite this, Elrico showcased strong capabilities in strength-based exercises, notably performing well in the Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges. His pacing strategy indicates a fast start, especially in the early running segments, with a noticeable slowdown after the Sled Push. This suggests a potential need for better energy distribution throughout the race. Overall, Elrico demonstrates a hybrid profile with a slight edge in strength disciplines, although there's room for improvement in running endurance and transition efficiency (Roxzone).
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grassi Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:31:21 | |
| Svane Garrett | 2023 Dallas | 01:31:43 | |
| Elliott James | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:52 | |
| Collins Nicholas | 2024 Anaheim | 01:32:11 | |
| Stutzkowski Frank | 2019 Hamburg | 01:31:32 | |
| Hoffmann Erik | 2020 Hannover | 01:31:38 | |
| Arellano Leyva Roberto | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:31:34 | |
| Kube Dennis | 2019 Hannover | 01:31:35 | |
| Medina Bárcenas Josué | 2024 Mexico City | 01:31:53 | |
| Werthmann Daniel | 2024 Berlin | 01:31:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
