Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sharp Neil's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sharp Neil's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sharp Neil's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sharp Neil's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:27 | 04:06 to 02:39 | 25.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:26 | 06:10 to 04:44 | 25.4% |
| Run Total | 01:18 | 42:27 to 41:09 | 23.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 05:36 to 04:53 | 12.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:31 | 06:26 to 05:55 | 9.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:15 to 02:01 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sharp Neil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 04:34 -01:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:11 | 04:25 -00:11 | 04:34 -01:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 07:25 | 04:54 +00:26 | 08:59 -01:34 |
| Sled Push | 04:06 | 12:45 | 02:52 +01:14 | 13:53 -01:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:51 | 05:21 +00:04 | 16:45 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 22:16 | 04:51 -00:36 | 22:06 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 26:31 | 05:19 +00:13 | 26:57 -00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 32:03 | 05:12 +00:24 | 32:16 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 37:39 | 05:29 +00:23 | 37:28 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:31 | 04:47 -00:12 | 42:57 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 48:06 | 05:20 +00:17 | 47:44 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 53:43 | 02:08 +00:07 | 53:04 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 55:58 | 05:19 +00:24 | 55:12 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:10 | 01:01:41 | 04:59 +01:11 | 01:00:31 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:51 | 01:07:51 | 05:55 -00:04 | 01:05:30 +02:21 |
| Wall Balls | 06:26 | 01:13:42 | 06:20 +00:06 | 01:11:25 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 04:26 | 01:24:26 | 06:41 -02:15 | 01:24:26 |
Neil Sharp had a strong performance in the 2023 Dublin Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 204 out of 1139 athletes, placing him in the top 17% of all participants. In his age group (45-49), Neil achieved an impressive rank of 11, placing him in the top 10% of 108 athletes. His overall time of 01:24:26 showcases his commitment and dedication to the race.
Neil's total running time of 00:42:27 indicates that he was 01:38 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that improving his running ability could significantly enhance his performance. It is important for Neil to focus on building his running endurance and speed.
In conclusion, Neil Sharp had an impressive performance in the 2023 Dublin Hyrox race. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his running ability, particularly in segments where he lost significant time. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to address his weaknesses will help him achieve better results in future races. With proper pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation, Neil has the potential to excel even further in the Hyrox competition.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodhouse Teddy | 2023 Milan | 01:24:36 | |
| Morton Scott | 2022 London | 01:24:05 | |
| Sweeney James | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:15 | |
| Chaves Paulo | 2023 Rimini | 01:24:41 | |
| Núñez Del Río Alberto | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:28 | |
| Parkinson Ryan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:56 | |
| Mommertz Max | 2023 Köln | 01:24:16 | |
| Nozal Mateo | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:15 | |
| Langley Joshua | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:24:45 | |
| Tan Terence | 2024 Singapore | 01:24:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:17:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
