Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 152 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stuck Chanel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stuck Chanel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stuck Chanel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stuck Chanel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:42 | 07:34 to 06:52 | 23.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 06:03 to 05:28 | 19.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 04:49 to 04:15 | 18.8% |
| Run Total | 00:34 | 44:34 to 44:00 | 18.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 05:55 to 05:29 | 14.4% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:20 to 05:11 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:55 to 04:54 | 0.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Stuck Chanel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:51 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 03:48 | 04:54 +00:01 | 04:51 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:43 | 05:15 +00:16 | 09:45 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 04:49 | 14:14 | 04:12 +00:37 | 15:00 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 19:03 | 05:36 +00:09 | 19:12 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 07:34 | 24:48 | 07:09 +00:25 | 24:48 +00:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 32:22 | 05:38 +00:11 | 31:57 +00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 38:11 | 05:37 +00:26 | 37:35 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 44:14 | 05:46 +00:04 | 43:12 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 50:04 | 05:12 +00:08 | 48:58 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 55:24 | 05:42 +00:14 | 54:10 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 01:01:20 | 02:56 -00:25 | 59:52 +01:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 01:03:51 | 05:46 +00:09 | 01:02:48 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:09:46 | 05:40 +00:15 | 01:08:34 +01:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:15:41 | 06:20 -00:16 | 01:14:14 +01:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:21:45 | 07:00 -01:14 | 01:20:34 +01:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:34:18 | 06:44 +00:11 | 01:34:18 |
Chanel Stuck delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane event, securing the 62nd overall rank and finishing first in her age group, demonstrating her competitive edge. Her overall time was 01:34:18, placing her in the top 29% of all athletes. Chanel's running prowess is evident, as her total running time of 00:44:34 was 00:31 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Notably, she began with a particularly fast pace, ranking in the 6th percentile during the Running 1 segment, suggesting a potentially too aggressive start which may have impacted her energy reserves in subsequent segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Irwin Jo | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:34:33 | |
| Battersea Ruth | 2023 London | 01:34:28 | |
| Mcguffie Harriet | 2022 London | 01:34:36 | |
| Brown Kirsty | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:29 | |
| Idini Fabiana | 2024 Rimini | 01:33:48 | |
| Weber LuisaMarie | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:34:27 | |
| Bretscher Anna | 2024 New York | 01:34:30 | |
| Bachkönig Sarah | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:14 | |
| Kenny Michelle | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:42 | |
| 闻 雯 | 2024 Beijing | 01:34:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
