Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 752 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire ReevesKneip Alice's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights ReevesKneip Alice's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the ReevesKneip Alice's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve ReevesKneip Alice's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:38 | 07:30 to 05:52 | 35.6% |
| Run Total | 01:25 | 52:10 to 50:45 | 30.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 03:00 to 02:28 | 11.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:30 to 03:05 | 9.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:19 | 07:36 to 07:17 | 6.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:48 to 05:32 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| ReevesKneip Alice | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 06:12 | 05:20 -00:17 | 05:37 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 11:15 | 06:08 -00:14 | 10:57 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 17:09 | 03:07 +00:23 | 17:05 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 20:39 | 06:28 -00:17 | 20:12 +00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 26:50 | 06:42 -00:53 | 26:40 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 32:39 | 06:32 -00:15 | 33:22 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:36 | 38:56 | 07:34 +00:02 | 39:54 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 06:44 | 46:32 | 06:43 +00:01 | 47:28 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 53:16 | 05:40 -00:18 | 54:11 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 06:58 | 58:38 | 06:34 +00:24 | 59:51 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 01:05:36 | 02:31 +00:29 | 01:06:25 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:08:36 | 06:34 +00:06 | 01:08:56 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 01:15:16 | 05:40 +00:08 | 01:15:30 -00:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:18 | 01:21:04 | 07:15 +00:03 | 01:21:10 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 07:30 | 01:28:22 | 06:07 +01:23 | 01:28:25 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:42:51 | 08:19 -01:11 | 01:42:51 |
Alice ReevesKneip delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 353 out of 1014 athletes, putting her in the top 34%. Within her age group, she ranked 52nd among 105 athletes, placing her in the top 49%. Her total time was 01:42:51, with an impressive total running time of 00:52:10, which is 00:32 faster than the average. This indicates that Alice has a stronger running profile, which is further supported by her consistently faster-than-average running splits, except for Running 6. Her pacing strategy suggests a balanced approach, not starting too fast or too slow, as seen in her initial running segments. Alice's strong running abilities are evident, though there is room for enhancing her strength in specific exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Matlock Erin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:42:55 | |
| Mauer Silja | 2019 Hamburg | 01:42:57 | |
| Moore Georgina | 2024 Milan | 01:42:57 | |
| Jenyns Clare | 2024 Dublin | 01:42:28 | |
| Logan Shannon | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:43:19 | |
| Trapichler Veronika | 2023 Wien | 01:42:25 | |
| Bowring Antonia | 2024 New York | 01:42:55 | |
| Schneider Chelsea | 2024 Brisbane | 01:42:30 | |
| Gatus Bianca | 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:47 | |
| Ai Kian Teo | 2024 Singapore | 01:42:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
