Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 972 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Newell Chelsea's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Newell Chelsea's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Newell Chelsea's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Newell Chelsea's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 08:59 to 03:50 | 89.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 04:57 to 04:37 | 5.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:15 | 03:47 to 03:32 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:21 to 39:21 | 0.0% |
| Newell Chelsea | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:30 | 00:00 | 04:42 -01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 03:30 | 04:55 -00:16 | 04:42 -01:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 08:09 | 05:01 -00:03 | 09:37 -01:28 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 13:07 | 02:30 -00:35 | 14:38 -01:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 15:02 | 05:17 -00:11 | 17:08 -02:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 20:08 | 05:01 -00:38 | 22:25 -02:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 24:31 | 05:18 -00:15 | 27:26 -02:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:57 | 29:34 | 05:08 -00:11 | 32:44 -03:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 34:31 | 05:25 -00:10 | 37:52 -03:21 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 39:46 | 05:08 -00:10 | 43:17 -03:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 44:44 | 05:20 -00:12 | 48:25 -03:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 49:52 | 02:03 -00:17 | 53:45 -03:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 51:38 | 05:17 -00:07 | 55:48 -04:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:59 | 56:48 | 04:10 +04:49 | 01:01:05 -04:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:14 | 01:05:47 | 05:34 -00:20 | 01:05:15 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 01:11:01 | 04:11 -00:24 | 01:10:49 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:05 | 01:20:46 | 05:46 +00:19 | 01:20:46 |
Chelsea Newell delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, finishing in the top 11% overall and the top 5% within her age group. Her total running time was notably strong, clocking in at 00:39:21, which is 3:00 minutes faster than the average. This suggests that Chelsea has a robust runner profile. However, her performance on the sandbag lunges segment was significantly below average, indicating a need for targeted improvement in strength and endurance exercises. The pacing analysis shows that she started strong with exceptional speed in the initial running segments but may have maintained a slightly less aggressive pace as the race progressed, which is generally strategic for endurance events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chalmers Karen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:39 | |
| Willis Bethany | 2022 London | 01:20:36 | |
| Theunisse Anna | 2024 Köln | 01:20:32 | |
| Coope Justine | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:17 | |
| Crugnola Laura | 2024 Turin | 01:20:35 | |
| Potter Andrea | 2023 Milan | 01:21:11 | |
| Thomson Katie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:12 | |
| Su Serena | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:47 | |
| Linsley Tracy | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:41 | |
| Maslin Indiana | 2023 Birmingham | 01:20:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
