Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Tigue Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Tigue Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Tigue Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Tigue Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:23 | 06:45 to 05:22 | 35.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:59 | 03:08 to 02:09 | 25.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 05:52 to 05:07 | 19.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:31 | 06:59 to 06:28 | 13.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:39 to 04:27 | 5.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:58 to 02:52 | 2.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:10 to 43:10 | 0.0% |
| Mc Tigue Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 03:32 | 04:30 +00:09 | 04:47 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:11 | 05:06 -00:06 | 09:17 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:58 | 13:11 | 03:02 -00:04 | 14:23 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 16:09 | 05:34 -00:10 | 17:25 -01:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 21:33 | 05:12 -00:57 | 22:59 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 25:48 | 05:33 -00:03 | 28:11 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:45 | 31:18 | 05:42 +01:03 | 33:44 -02:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 38:03 | 05:44 -00:02 | 39:26 -01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:45 | 04:53 -00:18 | 45:10 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 48:20 | 05:34 +00:24 | 50:03 -01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:08 | 54:18 | 02:17 +00:51 | 55:37 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 57:26 | 05:33 +00:13 | 57:54 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:52 | 01:03:12 | 05:25 +00:27 | 01:03:27 -00:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:09:04 | 06:15 +00:08 | 01:08:52 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:59 | 01:15:27 | 06:54 +00:05 | 01:15:07 +00:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:04 | 01:29:21 | 07:20 -00:16 | 01:29:21 |
Paul Mc Tigue delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 323, placing him in the top 31% of the entire field and top 26% in his age group. His overall time of 01:29:21 reflects a commendable effort, particularly in the running components. Notably, his total running time of 00:43:10 was 01:20 faster than the average, indicating strong running capabilities. This suggests a runner profile, as he excels in the running segments but could benefit from enhancing his strength components. Additionally, his initial pace was quite aggressive, as evidenced by his Running 1 time, which was significantly faster than average. However, his pacing appeared to stabilize in later segments. His Roxzone time was slightly faster than average, indicating decent transition efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rincu Dumitru | 2024 Milan | 01:29:37 | |
| Foster Miguel | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:36 | |
| Cano Jose | 2021 London | 01:29:40 | |
| Burley Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:12 | |
| Finnegan Paul | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:21 | |
| Coe Rich | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:06 | |
| Ritchie Michael | 2023 Malaga | 01:29:07 | |
| Smith Kevin | 2024 London | 01:29:08 | |
| Lamprey Jason | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:55 | |
| Odong Emmanuel | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:29:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
