Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kempe Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kempe Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kempe Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kempe Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:57 | 47:26 to 42:29 | 92.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:26 to 05:12 | 4.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 02:55 to 02:48 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:08 to 02:06 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Kempe Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:37 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 03:37 | 04:29 -00:23 | 04:41 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 07:43 | 05:03 +00:07 | 09:10 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 12:53 | 02:59 -00:04 | 14:13 -01:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 15:48 | 05:31 +00:03 | 17:12 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:13 | 21:22 | 05:04 -00:51 | 22:43 -01:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 25:35 | 05:29 +00:12 | 27:47 -02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:26 | 31:16 | 05:32 -00:06 | 33:16 -02:00 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 36:42 | 05:40 +01:25 | 38:48 -02:06 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:47 | 04:52 -00:17 | 44:28 -00:41 |
| Running 6 | 07:08 | 48:22 | 05:31 +01:37 | 49:20 -00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 55:30 | 02:14 -00:06 | 54:51 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:29 | 57:38 | 05:30 +00:59 | 57:05 +00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 01:04:07 | 05:16 -00:34 | 01:02:35 +01:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:08:49 | 06:09 +00:38 | 01:07:51 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 04:57 | 01:15:36 | 06:45 -01:48 | 01:14:00 +01:36 |
| Roxzone | 07:25 | 01:27:48 | 07:03 +00:22 | 01:27:48 |
Matt Kempe demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 302 out of 1014 athletes, placing him in the top 29%. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 93 out of 247, landing in the top 37%. While his overall time was competitive, his total running time of 47:26 was 3:30 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in this area. Matt's profile suggests a strong hybrid athlete with commendable performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Wall Balls and Sled Pull. However, his running splits indicate that he may have started too fast, with his initial running segments being significantly faster than average, which could have contributed to fatigue in later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bumpus Eric | 2024 Houston | 01:28:17 | |
| Murrant Tom | 2024 London | 01:28:05 | |
| Valverde Munuera Joan Carles | 2023 Barcelona | 01:27:22 | |
| Blum Marcel | 2023 Köln | 01:27:35 | |
| Garbin Aldo | 2024 Turin | 01:27:32 | |
| Doyle Mark | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:52 | |
| Mueller Manuel | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:27:40 | |
| Reuters Marvin | 2021 Hamburg | 01:28:18 | |
| Mcfadden Gavin | 2023 Melbourne | 01:27:51 | |
| Schultz Markus | 2024 Cape Town | 01:28:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
