Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 723 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kemerer Krystal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kemerer Krystal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kemerer Krystal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kemerer Krystal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:13 | 05:23 to 04:10 | 25.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 04:15 to 03:12 | 22.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 04:56 to 04:09 | 16.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:29 | 05:07 to 04:38 | 10.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:10 to 01:45 | 8.7% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:15 to 04:51 | 8.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 03:54 to 03:32 | 7.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:01 to 01:57 | 1.4% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:45 to 37:45 | 0.0% |
| Kemerer Krystal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:27 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 03:41 | 04:49 +00:18 | 04:27 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 08:48 | 04:44 +00:10 | 09:16 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 13:42 | 02:22 -00:21 | 14:00 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 15:43 | 04:59 -00:03 | 16:22 -00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 20:39 | 04:42 +00:14 | 21:21 -00:42 |
| Running 4 | 04:51 | 25:35 | 04:59 -00:08 | 26:03 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:23 | 30:26 | 04:42 +00:41 | 31:02 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 04:42 | 35:49 | 05:05 -00:23 | 35:44 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 40:31 | 05:02 +00:13 | 40:49 -00:18 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 45:46 | 05:02 -00:11 | 45:51 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 50:37 | 01:58 +00:12 | 50:53 -00:16 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 52:47 | 05:00 -00:06 | 52:51 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:54 | 57:41 | 03:51 +00:03 | 57:51 -00:10 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 01:01:35 | 05:16 -00:18 | 01:01:42 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:15 | 01:06:33 | 03:52 +00:23 | 01:06:58 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:29 | 01:16:10 | 05:20 +00:09 | 01:16:10 |
Krystal Kemerer delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 55th, which places her in the top 5% of participants. In her age group (25-29), she ranked 15th, demonstrating her competitive edge. Her total running time was 37:45, which is 2:20 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Krystal showed a tendency to start strong, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average. This suggests she might benefit from slightly pacing herself better in the initial stages to conserve energy for later segments. Overall, Krystal exhibits a strong hybrid profile, with her running ability being a key strength, but there is room for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Folscheid Charlotte | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:16:12 | |
| Bober Kathleen | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:16:35 | |
| Wasnaire Alexane | 2024 Poznan | 01:15:45 | |
| Skärstrand Hanna | 2023 Malmö | 01:15:59 | |
| Ferreira Díaz Lucia | 2023 Madrid | 01:16:06 | |
| Tutu Adelene | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:10 | |
| Contini Giulia | 2024 Milan | 01:15:58 | |
| Hall Kerry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:27 | |
| Sivignon Elodie | 2024 Turin | 01:16:17 | |
| Ratzkowski Lea | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:16:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
