Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 723 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tutu Adelene's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tutu Adelene's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tutu Adelene's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tutu Adelene's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 05:02 to 04:09 | 24.3% |
| Run Total | 00:49 | 39:02 to 38:13 | 22.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 03:38 to 03:12 | 11.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:22 to 01:57 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 05:00 to 04:38 | 10.1% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:11 to 04:51 | 9.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 03:44 to 03:32 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 01:56 to 01:45 | 5.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Tutu Adelene | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:32 | 00:00 | 04:27 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:32 | 04:49 +00:11 | 04:27 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 09:32 | 04:44 -00:16 | 09:16 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 14:00 | 02:22 +00:00 | 14:00 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 16:22 | 04:59 -00:18 | 16:22 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 21:03 | 04:42 +00:20 | 21:21 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 26:05 | 04:59 -00:03 | 26:03 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:57 | 31:01 | 04:42 -00:45 | 31:02 -00:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 34:58 | 05:05 -00:05 | 35:44 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 39:58 | 05:02 +00:09 | 40:49 -00:51 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 45:09 | 05:02 -00:04 | 45:51 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 50:07 | 01:58 -00:02 | 50:53 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 52:03 | 05:00 +00:18 | 52:51 -00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:44 | 57:21 | 03:51 -00:07 | 57:51 -00:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:12 | 01:01:05 | 05:16 -00:04 | 01:01:42 -00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 03:38 | 01:06:17 | 03:52 -00:14 | 01:06:58 -00:41 |
| Roxzone | 06:23 | 01:16:10 | 05:20 +01:03 | 01:16:10 |
Adelene Tutu delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 61, placing her in the top 3% of all competitors and 12th in her age group. Notably, her total running time was 1:03 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her pacing strategy reflected a slightly slow start in the first running segment, followed by consistent improvements in subsequent runs. This suggests potential for optimizing her initial pacing to maximize performance throughout the race.
Adelene spent significantly more time transitioning between exercises. Improving overall fitness and transition efficiency is crucial. Training Strategies:
The sled pull presented a challenge, likely due to strength requirements. Training Strategies:
Efficiency in wall balls can be improved through technique refinement. Training Strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald Katrina | 2022 Birmingham | 01:16:06 | |
| Pendlebury Abbie | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:21 | |
| Davies Ann | 2023 Birmingham | 01:16:13 | |
| Pastor Pérez Nuria | 2024 Madrid | 01:15:58 | |
| Hübenet Anne | 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:38 | |
| Steffen Caroline | 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:35 | |
| Simon Hannah | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:20 | |
| Conyers Katie | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:59 | |
| Schofield Sophie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:39 | |
| Bagnasco Agnese | 2024 Rimini | 01:16:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
