Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gregg Ben's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gregg Ben's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gregg Ben's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gregg Ben's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:19 | 38:35 to 37:16 | 29.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:15 | 05:19 to 04:04 | 27.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:08 | 05:02 to 03:54 | 25.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 02:42 to 02:15 | 10.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 05:17 to 05:00 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:32 to 04:29 | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:46 to 01:45 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Gregg Ben | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:49 | 00:00 | 04:14 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 02:49 | 04:18 -00:17 | 04:14 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 06:50 | 04:33 -00:06 | 08:32 -01:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 11:17 | 02:37 +00:05 | 13:05 -01:48 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 13:59 | 04:54 +00:03 | 15:42 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 18:56 | 04:21 +00:41 | 20:36 -01:40 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 23:58 | 04:53 +00:05 | 24:57 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:51 | 28:56 | 04:32 -00:41 | 29:50 -00:54 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 32:47 | 05:00 +00:11 | 34:22 -01:35 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 37:58 | 04:36 -00:04 | 39:22 -01:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 42:30 | 04:54 +00:28 | 43:58 -01:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 47:52 | 01:58 -00:12 | 48:52 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 49:38 | 04:52 +00:23 | 50:50 -01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 54:53 | 04:27 +00:52 | 55:42 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:00:12 | 05:17 +00:22 | 01:00:09 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:05:51 | 05:37 -00:20 | 01:05:26 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:44 | 01:16:45 | 05:42 +00:02 | 01:16:45 |
Ben Gregg delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane HYROX race, securing an overall rank of 117, placing him in the top 11% of participants. In his age group, he ranks 11th, positioning him in the top 7%, indicating a competitive edge among peers. His total running time of 00:38:35 was 23 seconds faster than the average, showcasing a strong runner's profile. However, his performance varied across different segments, indicating a need for a more balanced approach between running and strength elements.
In the initial running segments, Ben started extremely strong, particularly in Running 1, which was significantly faster than average, suggesting a fast start. However, his pace slowed in the latter running stages, indicating potential fatigue management issues. The data also suggests Ben has a runner profile, given his speed advantage in running compared to strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kühne Thilo | 2024 Berlin | 01:16:17 | |
| Miecke Johannes | 2022 Maastricht | 01:16:33 | |
| Ramirez Francisco | 2023 Dallas | 01:16:49 | |
| Zaun Andreas | 2024 Maastricht | 01:16:21 | |
| Mitchell Christopher | 2024 Dublin | 01:16:15 | |
| Tucker Liam | 2024 London | 01:17:11 | |
| Ullah Remi | 2023 London | 01:16:22 | |
| Cant Joe | 2024 Berlin | 01:16:35 | |
| Melham Bas | 2021 London | 01:16:45 | |
| Hitos Guillermo | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:10:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
