Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Felicia Quincy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Felicia Quincy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Felicia Quincy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Felicia Quincy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 42:18 to 39:04 | 55.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 06:52 to 05:25 | 25.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:55 | 05:20 to 04:25 | 15.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:23 to 04:15 | 2.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:39 to 04:35 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:34 to 03:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Felicia Quincy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:31 | 00:00 | 04:21 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 03:31 | 04:21 +00:02 | 04:21 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:54 | 04:43 +00:12 | 08:42 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 12:49 | 02:43 -00:44 | 13:25 -00:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 14:48 | 05:05 +00:15 | 16:08 -01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 03:34 | 20:08 | 04:32 -00:58 | 21:13 -01:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 23:42 | 05:05 +00:37 | 25:45 -02:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:20 | 29:24 | 04:48 +00:32 | 30:50 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 34:44 | 05:13 +00:29 | 35:38 -00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 40:26 | 04:40 -00:01 | 40:51 -00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 45:05 | 05:06 +00:31 | 45:31 -00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 50:42 | 02:02 -00:24 | 50:37 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 52:20 | 05:04 +00:19 | 52:39 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 57:43 | 04:40 -00:35 | 57:43 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:01:48 | 05:33 +00:38 | 01:02:23 -00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 06:52 | 01:07:59 | 05:54 +00:58 | 01:07:56 +00:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:13 | 01:19:56 | 06:06 -00:53 | 01:19:56 |
Quincy Felicia delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 22% of all participants. His overall rank was 701 out of 3118 athletes, and within his age group (25-29), he placed 155th out of 629. His total race time was 01:19:56. Notably, his running performance was slightly below average, with a total running time of 00:42:18, which was 01:44 slower than the average. However, his strength elements, such as the Sled Push (9th percentile) and Sled Pull (10th percentile), were executed with notable proficiency.
Quincy's performance indicates a balanced profile, with strong strength elements and a need for improvement in running endurance and pacing. He started the race with a fast pace, as seen in Running 1, but struggled to maintain it in subsequent runs. This suggests a need for better pacing strategies to optimize performance across all segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcgarvey Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:41 | |
| Crowley Jack | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:52 | |
| Chenini Khemissi | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:53 | |
| 刘 博昊 | 2024 Beijing | 01:19:54 | |
| Cruzado Olmeda Javier | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:40 | |
| Nilsson Björn | 2023 Malmö | 01:20:07 | |
| Bergin John | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:44 | |
| Schmeißer Philipp | 2019 Wien | 01:19:29 | |
| Whitt Tyler | 2024 Dallas | 01:20:17 | |
| Amin Tristan | 2023 London | 01:19:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:14:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
